Am 2007-05-08 um 11:21 schrieb Jörg Hagmann: > Did I use the term "pseudo small caps" incorrectly? I assumed that the > version I generated is pseudo because it wasn't expressly designed. > That's also how the term is used in the wiki > (http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Pseudo_Small_Caps). But there is > also the > possibility of \cap{}, which simply generates smaller but otherwise > normal upper case letters, and which consequently are embedded. Are > they > both "pseudo"?
Only originally designed small caps are "real", all automatically generated (regardless of the mechanics) are "pseudo". Greetlings from Lake Constance! Hraban --- http://www.fiee.net/texnique/ http://wiki.contextgarden.net https://www.cacert.org (I'm an assurer) ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : [email protected] / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
