Khaled Hosny wrote:
> On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 08:02:10PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
>> Khaled Hosny wrote:
>>> (Moved from lautex mailing list, more bellow)
>>
>>
>> char 1614 and 1617 are to be relatively positioned using mkmk, so we
>> need a mark and a basemark match an donly anchor-11 qualifies as
>> basemark but ...
>
> Actually, 1617 (shadda) and 1615 (fatha) will form a shadda-fatha
> ligature, thus there is no proper mkmk anchors between both.
hm, they won't because 1615 becomes an initial and therefore an other
character
also, i wonder if this is ok:
["char"]="shaddaKasra",
["components"]="shadda fatha",
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
| www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
