Khaled Hosny wrote:
> On Fri, May 09, 2008 at 06:34:22PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
>> Khaled Hosny wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 08:02:10PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
>>>> Khaled Hosny wrote:
>>>>> (Moved from lautex mailing list, more bellow)
>>>>
>>>> char 1614 and 1617 are to be relatively positioned using mkmk, so we
>>>> need a mark and a basemark match an donly anchor-11 qualifies as
>>>> basemark but ...
>>> Actually, 1617 (shadda) and 1615 (fatha) will form a shadda-fatha
>>> ligature, thus there is no proper mkmk anchors between both.
>> hm, they won't because 1615 becomes an initial and therefore an other
>> character
>
> I'm not sure if I understand this, do marks have initial and other
> forms?
>
>> also, i wonder if this is ok:
>>
>> ["char"]="shaddaKasra",
>> ["components"]="shadda fatha",
>
> The ligature is OK, just the name is wrong (I named it wrongly while
> asleep or something).
no, but we have
\char 1605\char1617\char1614
which becomes:
\char57392\char1617\char1614\par
so, if you want such a ligature you need to ligature
\char57392\char1617
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
| www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
