On Thu, 11 Jun 2009, Mojca Miklavec wrote:

> > - or setuptex should be rather an executable, that prints out the
> >  environment to apply, then one would do something like this:
> >  eval `setuptex`
> >  (cleaner solution, but some work to do and all minimal-users must change
> >  their habits...)
> I theory adjusting PATH should do, but it's a nice proposal :)

So TEXMFCACHE and TEXMFOS are not needed?
And what about the praxis in contrast do the theory?

Here my little test:
unset TEXMFOS 
context test
-> MTXrun | unknown script 'context.lua' or 'mtx-context.lua'

Cheers, Peter

Contact information: http://pmrb.free.fr/contact/

If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net

Reply via email to