On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 12:36 AM, luigi scarso <luigi.sca...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 12:06 AM, Mojca Miklavec > <mojca.miklavec.li...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 22:24, Hans Hagen <pra...@wxs.nl> wrote: >>> On 13-6-2011 12:28, Mojca Miklavec wrote: >>> >>>>>>>> \si=undefined. >>>>>> >>>>>> anyway, afaik si is relates to slovenian >>>>> >>>>> No, only to Sinhalese. >>> >>> not always .... >>> >>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Country_codes:_S#.C2.A0Slovenia >> >> No. Always. >> >> This is exactly like saying that "be" should refer to Dutch language, >> that "ch" and "si" should refer to Italian and "it" should refer to >> German language. >> >> I suggest to switch the language code for Dutch into "be" and call the >> format cont-be :) > why not iso 639-3 ? > http://www.sil.org/iso639-3/iso-639-3_20110525.ta http://www.sil.org/iso639-3/iso-639-3_20110525.tab
-- luigi ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
