On Thu, 13 Sep 2012, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Thu, 13 Sep 2012, Otared Kavian wrote:
On 13 sept. 2012, at 02:34, Aditya Mahajan <adit...@umich.edu> wrote:
For some reason, the numbering in itemize is affected by the value of
userpage!
\setupuserpagenumber[start=12]
\starttext
\startitemize[n,reverse]
\item One
\item Two
\stopitemize
\stoptext
With ConTeXt 2012.09.11 20:36 I get
13. One
12. Two
Any ideas?
Yes it is a strange behaviour and it appears only when using mkiv and
reversed itemize, even with
\setuppagenumber[start=12]
instead of
\setupuserpagenumber[start=12]
Also the pagenumber remains unchanged with either of these commands, which
means that it's a bug.
I tested your example with Context version 2011.11.29, mkiv and there
everything is correct.
Thanks for testing. I also tested with 2012.07.
I have been able to isolate the bug to the update on 2012.07.09;
specifically to this commit.
http://repo.or.cz/w/context.git/blobdiff/6f124794f7dc253f8b83f2517c26ce17e50d66ff..refs/heads/origin:/tex/context/base/strc-num.mkiv
If I replace the current version of strc-num.mkiv with the version from
2012.07.09:
http://repo.or.cz/w/context.git/blob_plain/6f124794f7dc253f8b83f2517c26ce17e50d66ff:/tex/context/base/strc-num.mkiv
then the numbering is correct.
However, I cannot figure out what is causing the bug in that change.
Aditya
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
