On Thu, 13 Sep 2012, Aditya Mahajan wrote:

On Thu, 13 Sep 2012, Aditya Mahajan wrote:

On Thu, 13 Sep 2012, Otared Kavian wrote:

On 13 sept. 2012, at 02:34, Aditya Mahajan <adit...@umich.edu> wrote:

For some reason, the numbering in itemize is affected by the value of userpage!

 \item One
 \item Two

With ConTeXt  2012.09.11 20:36 I get

13. One
12. Two

Any ideas?

Yes it is a strange behaviour and it appears only when using mkiv and reversed itemize, even with
instead of
Also the pagenumber remains unchanged with either of these commands, which means that it's a bug.

I tested your example with Context version 2011.11.29, mkiv and there everything is correct.

Thanks for testing. I also tested with 2012.07.

I have been able to isolate the bug to the update on 2012.07.09; specifically to this commit.


If I replace the current version of strc-num.mkiv with the version from 2012.07.09:

then the numbering is correct.

However, I cannot figure out what is causing the bug in that change.

The bug disappears if I add




in the test file!

If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net

Reply via email to