On Thu, 31 Jul 2003 05:11:59 -0700, Kenneth Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> --On Wednesday, July 30, 2003 05:18:25 PM -0500 "Burton M. Strauss > III" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > For some reason there's no new rpms at > > http://people.ee.ethz.ch/~oetiker/webtools/rrdtool/pub/ - they > > haven't created rpms for .42 ... .45, so this temporary version is > > still hanging around. > > I just checked the .45 tarball, and it looks like it builds fine using > "rpmbuild -ta rrdtool-1.0.45.tar.gz". That eliminates any need for an > SRPM. I always build from SRPM or RPM-compliant tarball for any RPM > not from my distro, to make sure it tunes itself to my setup, so I'm > not concerned that there's no binary RPM. > > ... Whoops, spoke too soon, the packaging step whines that I'm missing > "MRTG-HOWTO". ..a very good reason to toss non-essential dep's, out of the .spec-file. AFAIK, Red Hat does not. -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;-) ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... Scenarios always come in sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case. _______________________________________________ Ntop mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop
