Not sure if we're on the same page here or just semantics?  SPAN is an
acceptable method to gain visibility into network flows.  In REALLY high
packet rate environments you may need a tap, but for most situations
SPAN is fine.   I'm only familiar with Ci$co options, and those are very
flexible -  including: tx, rx, both , VLAN's, and access-lists to
further filter the traffic that is replicated to your
destination/monitor port.  In most cases using SPAN won't cause any
issues on the switch - even at high rates.  If you're using RSPAN or
ERSPAN, obviously if you're mirroring a 1Gb interface to a server and
your destination port is on another switch over a 1Gb IF - you could
cause some issues for yourself if the server interface you're monitoring
has a high load.

 

SPAN is your friend!

 

 

________________________________

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
Mel Beckman
Sent: Friday, January 30, 2009 12:29 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Ntop] Non IP Traffic

 

Even a bidi port won't be receiving much, if anything, from ntop.

-mel via cell


On Jan 30, 2009, at 9:49 AM, "Gary Gatten" <[email protected]> wrote:

        Most spans are bidirectional capable now.

        
________________________________


        From: [email protected] 
        To: [email protected] 
        Cc: [email protected] 
        Sent: Fri Jan 30 11:44:21 2009
        Subject: Re: [Ntop] Non IP Traffic 
        
        

        Since a span port is transmit only, there is no way it can "clog
the switch." The pc might get bogged down, but the switch won't know or
care.
        
        -mel via cell

        
        On Jan 30, 2009, at 5:57 AM, "Walt Henley" <
<mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]> wrote:

                That's all he will see unless he gets the NetFlow plugin
operating on a switch or router in his network.  Or, he could have his
PC connected to a SPAN port (not recommended, could clog the switch).
3kb/s of traffic is not going to kill his WS.  Pretty typical.  I have a
site I'm working on currently with 30kB/s of broadcast noise.  Not much
in 100 mb/s links.

                On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 10:49 PM, Burton Strauss III <
<mailto:[email protected]>  <mailto:[email protected]>
[email protected]> wrote:

                Well, what you are seeing is a varied collection of
broadcast traffic...
                
                ARP - address resolution protocol - is how you find an
address on the LOCAL
                segment.
                
                NBNS - NetBIOS, a local (non-routable) protocol
                
                MS NLB - Microsoft Network Load Balancing protocol
                
                Etc.

                
                -----Burton
                
                -----Original Message-----
                From: <mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]> [email protected] [mailto:
<mailto:[email protected]>  <mailto:[email protected]>
[email protected]] On Behalf Of
                Martin Larsson

                Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 6:47 AM
                To: <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>
[email protected]

                Subject: Re: [Ntop] Non IP Traffic
                
                Everything is just running on my local machine, yes.
                All I'm trying to do is to understand why my
network-adapter is receiving
                all that data. It looks like there's a fairly constant
stream of about
                3Kbits...
                
                But thanks for the info, I'll do some more simple checks
and notify my
                admins.
                
                M.
                
                On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 3:27 PM, Walt Henley <
<mailto:[email protected]>  <mailto:[email protected]>
[email protected]> wrote:
                > This trace may not be telling you the whole story.
Did you put the
                > Wireshark machine on a SPAN port or just run it
locally connected at your
                > PC?  If you ran it locally connected, then all you are
seeing is your
                > traffic and any broadcasts that come along.  Also, how
are you collecting
                > NTOP data?   Using NetFlow or Sflow or just with a
local connection.
                Could
                > be that it is seeing the heartbeats and deciding they
are not identifyable
                > IP traffic.  Try running netflow on your ethernet
switches (assuming they
                > are Cisco)>
                >
                > On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 8:59 AM, Martin Larsson <
<mailto:[email protected]>  <mailto:[email protected]>
[email protected]>
                > wrote:
                >>
                >> Thanks. WireShark was interesting, and overwhelming.
                >> It seems there's a lot of "MS NLB Heartbeat" each
containing 1510 bytes.
                >> Could that be it?
                >> I've attached a sample screenshot.
                >>
                >> On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 2:16 PM, Burton Strauss III
                >> < <mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]> wrote:
                >> > It means ntop is seeing a lot of traffic that isn't
recognizable as
                >> > tcp/ip.
                >> >
                >> > Depending on your connection and what you are
monitoring (network
                >> > topology)
                >> > this could be normal (i.e. traffic wrapped in
something) or it could be
                >> > odd.
                >> >
                >> > I usually recommend installing WireShark and
letting it analyze a few
                >> > dozen
                >> > packets (they both use libpcap so they look at
traffic the same way).
                >> >  If
                >> > WireShark calls it differently than ntop, you
probably have exposed
                some
                >> > bug. If they both call it non-ip, then explain your
topology and we can
                >> > guide you.  If you aren't sure, grab & post a
screen shot of a page of
                >> > random traffic from WireShark, post it and we can
read what you have
                >> > from
                >> > there...
                >> >
                >> > -----Burton
                >> >
                >> >
                >> >
                >> >
                >> >
                >> > -----Original Message-----
                >> > From: <mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]> [email protected] [mailto:
<mailto:[email protected]>  <mailto:[email protected]>
[email protected]] On Behalf Of
                >> > Martin Larsson
                >> > Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 3:54 AM
                >> > To: <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>
[email protected]
                >> > Subject: [Ntop] Non IP Traffic
                >> >
                >> > I installed ntop because the system monitor told me
my network was
                >> > fairly
                >> > active
                >> > even though I wasn't actively sending or receiving
anything.
                >> > After about 1.5 hours of running, the traffic
summary is showing me a
                >> > lot of
                >> > non-IP traffic.
                >> >
                >> > Total   26.4 MBytes [47,672 Pkts]
                >> > IP Traffic      9.3 MBytes [26,718 Pkts]
                >> > Fragmented IP Traffic   0 [0.0%]
                >> > Non IP Traffic  17.1 MBytes
                >> >
                >> > What does that mean?
                >> >
                >> > M.
                >> > _______________________________________________
                >> > Ntop mailing list
                >> > <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>
[email protected]
                >> > <http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop>
<http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop>
http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop
                >> >
                >> > _______________________________________________
                >> > Ntop mailing list
                >> > <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>
[email protected]
                >> > <http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop>
<http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop>
http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop
                >> >
                >>
                >> _______________________________________________
                >> Ntop mailing list
                >> <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>
[email protected]
                >> <http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop>
<http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop>
http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop
                >>
                >
                >
                > _______________________________________________
                > Ntop mailing list
                > <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>
[email protected]
                > <http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop>
<http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop>
http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop
                >
                >
                _______________________________________________
                Ntop mailing list
                <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>
[email protected]
                <http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop>
<http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop>
http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop
                
                _______________________________________________
                Ntop mailing list
                <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>
[email protected]
                <http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop>
<http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop>
http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop

                 

                _______________________________________________
                Ntop mailing list
                <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]
                <http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop>
http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop

        "This email is intended to be reviewed by only the intended
recipient and may contain information that is privileged and/or
confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that any review, use, dissemination, disclosure or copying of
this email and its attachments, if any, is strictly prohibited. If you
have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender
by return email and delete this email from your system." 

        _______________________________________________
        Ntop mailing list
        [email protected]
        http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop






<font size="1">
<div style='border:none;border-bottom:double windowtext 2.25pt;padding:0in 0in 
1.0pt 0in'>
</div>
"This email is intended to be reviewed by only the intended recipient
 and may contain information that is privileged and/or confidential.
 If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
 any review, use, dissemination, disclosure or copying of this email
 and its attachments, if any, is strictly prohibited.  If you have
 received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by
 return email and delete this email from your system."
</font>

_______________________________________________
Ntop mailing list
[email protected]
http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop

Reply via email to