> They probably thought they were being clever - making sure the print We'll see how clever they feel, when I hand them my invoice :)
Jean-Paul Natola > Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 08:44:19 -0400 > Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] MSIEXEC CPU on TS-Solved > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > > On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 7:48 PM, J- P <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'll be the first to acknowledge that my "coding skills" using the term very > > very very loosly- > > (took Access 97 and intro to UNIX back in '99 and have played with HTML as a > > hobby)but I cant see why anyone would hardcode specific device, as opposed > > to using "current_ default" > > They probably thought they were being clever - making sure the print > job was going to a printer with the right paper stock, or that the job > being printed was going to a printer high speed enough for such a > large job, or was going to the printer closest to the user so to make > it easier to go and get, or to be sure it printed out to a printer > away from "prying" eyes - I can come up with all sorts of reasons. > > None really valid, of course. :-) > >
