Do the various parts of the Charms bar have associated executables? If that's the case, I could restrict them with GPO or AM....time to fire up ProcMon....
On 1 May 2014 13:16, Melvin Backus <[email protected]> wrote: > Perhaps this? Haven’t tried it, just digging. > > > > > http://ezinearticles.com/?Image-File-Execution-Options---How-to-Hijack-a-Program&id=4088225 > > > > > > -- > There are 10 kinds of people in the world... > those who understand binary and those who don't. > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *James Rankin > *Sent:* Thursday, May 01, 2014 8:10 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [NTSysADM] Disable the f**king Charms bar in Windows 8.1 > > > > Additionally, the proxy part of this is just the single one that has been > highlighted to me. As the "Modern" interface doesn't appear to be > policy-enabled in any way, I am willing to bet there are many other holes > that users can poke through and avoid GPOs. Therefore I need to disable > access to the thing, foremostly. > > > > On 1 May 2014 13:02, Joseph L. Casale <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I need to disable this because users can use the Charms bar to bypass > the proxy > > How is your env setup such that this is even possible? Our users don’t > have a network > path anywhere not explicitly defined. > > Any app that *doesn't* use the proxy has no way out? > > > > > -- > > *James Rankin* > --------------------- > RCL - Senior Technical Consultant (ACA, CCA, MCTS) | The Virtualization > Practice Analyst - Desktop Virtualization > http://appsensebigot.blogspot.co.uk > -- *James Rankin* --------------------- RCL - Senior Technical Consultant (ACA, CCA, MCTS) | The Virtualization Practice Analyst - Desktop Virtualization http://appsensebigot.blogspot.co.uk
