That's a negative remark grounded in assumption; are you positive?
> On Oct 14, 2014, at 9:27, "Webster" <[email protected]> wrote: > > I think this current thread needs to end. > > Thanks > > > Webster > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > On Behalf Of Maglinger, Paul > Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2014 11:24 AM > To: '[email protected]' > Subject: RE: OT: A little coarse (was RE: [NTSysADM] Lync Group Chat) > > Ohm-my goodness. > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > On Behalf Of Jonathan Link > Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2014 10:58 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: OT: A little coarse (was RE: [NTSysADM] Lync Group Chat) > > Ohm. > I will now begin to meditate upon the futility of resistance. > Ohm. > > On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 11:46 AM, Webster <[email protected]> wrote: > No, I think it was your alternating current ego that typed that, not you. > > Thanks > > > Webster > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] > > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jim Mediger > > Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2014 10:40 AM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: RE: OT: A little coarse (was RE: [NTSysADM] Lync Group Chat) > > > > I found them somewhat electrifying where I’m normally resistant to those > > types of puns these jolted me awake this morning. Not sure I have the > > capacitance to continue along this short foray. Normally open minded but > > let's consider this circuit of puns closed. > > > > Ohm my God! did I just type that? > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] > > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Webster > > Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2014 7:47 AM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: RE: OT: A little coarse (was RE: [NTSysADM] Lync Group Chat) > > > > Webster approves of your use of puns. They were grate. > > > > Thanks > > > > > > Webster > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: [email protected] > > > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Kurt Buff > > > Sent: Monday, October 13, 2014 10:10 PM > > > To: [email protected] > > > Subject: Re: OT: A little coarse (was RE: [NTSysADM] Lync Group Chat) > > > > > > Shocking story, but it had a good arc. > > > > > > Evidently the event gave you a good grounding for the future. > > > > > > Kurt > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 7:18 PM, Michael B. Smith > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > HAHAHAHAHAHA. > > > > > > > > True story: My uncle (who is 80 years old now) told me, when I was a > > > > little > > > boy (perhaps 5 or 6), that it felt "really really good" to take a piss > > > on an electric fence. (This was a fence designed to keep cattle inside > > > of it.) > > > > > > > > So.... I did. > > > > > > > > After I could walk again, and I tried to beat him up, he told me "I > > > > can't fix > > > you being stupid, but maybe this will help you think." > > > > > > > > It was a memorable lesson. Obviously. > > > > > > > > Thanks for the memory. I haven't thought of that in a very long > > > > time. :) > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: [email protected] > > > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mark Liechty > > > > Sent: Monday, October 13, 2014 10:08 PM > > > > To: [email protected] > > > > Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] Lync Group Chat > > > > > > > > On Oct 13, 2014, at 7:03 PM, Ken Schaefer <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I think the requester is starting to "have a lend" ("take the > > > > piss", or > > > whatever the phrase is in your local vernacular). > > > > ##### > > > > > > > > More than once I have taken a piss on my keyboard. I never solved > > > > the > > > problem but did make me feel better. > > > > > > > > Tried that once on a server and the damn thing was tuned on. I > > > > suggest > > > that you not try that as electricity does not suck, it bites like hell. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > **Warning** Any technical data is or may be controlled under the U.S. > > International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) and may not be exported, > > released, or disclosed to foreign nationals without proper authorization by > > the U.S. Department of State.” “CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic > > transmission, its contents and any attachments (hereinafter referred to > > collectively as “transmission”) are confidential and are solely directed to, > > and intended for, the named addressee(s) only. Any use, reproduction or > > dissemination of this transmission by an unintended recipient is strictly > > prohibited. If you receive this transmission in error, please immediately > > notify the sender and delete this transmission in its entirety from your > > files. > > All intellectual property rights in this transmission are expressly > > reserved.” >
