Nope.  That's the new price for IT pro support cases since 12/1.

Susan Bradley
http://blogs.msmvps.com/bradley
http://www.runasradio.com/default.aspx?showNum=390

On 12/2/2014 2:12 PM, J- P wrote:
wow, 499 now? is that at least premier where the case doesnt have to go through multiple engineers





------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: [NTSysADM] RE: DPM weirdness.
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2014 19:38:10 +0000

It sure looks and acts like a junction point and is certainly weird. I am going to try a copy to another server share. Then I will PSS it, just in time for the new 499 price!!

*From:*[email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Michael B. Smith
*Sent:* Tuesday, December 2, 2014 2:34 PM
*To:* [email protected]
*Subject:* [NTSysADM] RE: DPM weirdness.

I’m sorry L

I’m out of ideas then.

*From:*[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Kennedy, Jim
*Sent:* Tuesday, December 2, 2014 2:21 PM
*To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
*Subject:* [NTSysADM] RE: DPM weirdness.

No, file not found with that syntax.

*From:*[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Michael B. Smith
*Sent:* Tuesday, December 2, 2014 2:14 PM
*To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
*Subject:* [NTSysADM] RE: DPM weirdness.

If you go into the source directory and do a “dir /a:ls” – do any of the files show up as JUNCTIONS?

*From:*[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Kennedy, Jim
*Sent:* Tuesday, December 2, 2014 1:06 PM
*To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
*Subject:* [NTSysADM] RE: DPM weirdness.

Just the three.

*From:*[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Michael B. Smith
*Sent:* Tuesday, December 2, 2014 12:39 PM
*To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
*Subject:* [NTSysADM] RE: DPM weirdness.

So? What happens when you restore the FRP to an alternate location? Do you get all the files? Or only 3 of them?

*From:*[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Kennedy, Jim
*Sent:* Tuesday, December 2, 2014 10:27 AM
*To:* '[email protected]'
*Subject:* [NTSysADM] DPM weirdness.

DPM 2012 SP 1 on 2008 R2 backing up a folder on 2008 R2. Agents and servers are fully patched. This has me baffled, never seen anything like this with DPM. I can always look at a folder recovery point and see the contents in total, not just the changes since the last recovery point. I realize the backups don’t work like a full…but the recovery points do. Except this one new job I set up recently on a new server. It displays like an incremental but not really. Bear with me, this will be hard to explain. Backed up server is a Filemaker Pro server. Think SQL for cave men, or maybe Access for Romans. It backs itself up to a folder each night, I grab that with DPM. Folder structure looks like this:


Inside each of the above folders, a couple of levels in, is this:


Note the bottom four files have not changed since original install, one changed a month ago and the top three are changed daily. When I look at the recovery point I should see all of the files right? Especially if you consider the folder they are in is brand new…new folder each night created by the filemaker internal backup. But I find it interesting that when filemaker makes the backup the file date on the server is from October even though it is a new folder and new files. They are not shortcuts.
12/1 recovery point:






Reply via email to