We use Avamar here for backup and replicate the backup data across our WAN. It 
works well, 
particularly given the modest bandwidth we've got. It's not a low cost solution 
though. There's 
going to be a tradeoff between how smart the backup compression/deduplication 
is (Avamar's 
is very clever) and how much bandwidth costs. If you've got fiber, and the data 
change rate 
isn't huge, you should have a bunch of options. 

----- Original Message -----

> Looks like you definitely have some additional information gathering before
> you can start identifying suitable solutions. Obviously the budget will be a
> big factor in narrowing down the options. With what you've provided it looks
> like you may want to focus on a single solution that can address both
> Physical and Virtual environments, provide application aware support for
> SQL/Exchange, and possibly include remote agent-based media servers to
> provide local de-dupe/compression to reduce impact to the MAN/WAN links.
> It's been awhile since I've been involved with a backup/data protection
> design project, but I do believe some of the following products may be worth
> looking at.
> Disclaimer, I've been in a larger enterprise environment for quite some time
> so some of these products may not be suitable for smaller environments:
> Microsoft DPM
> Vmware VDP
> CommVault
> EMC Avamar/Data Domain
> Veeam
> NetVault (Dell)
> As well as several cloud-based solutions from various sources. It may be
> worth looking into more DR oriented solutions (Zerto, Atlantis, etc) for the
> Virtual environment (if there's a focus on moving from physical to virtual).
> - Sean

> On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Art DeKneef < [email protected] > wrote:

> > I am asking for feedback from those that backup between multiple sites.
> > What
> > were the good things and what would you do different? First time I’ve had
> > to
> > look at this in a very long time.
> 

> > Talked with a potential new client looking to backup up between the two
> > offices and possibly cloud backup. Current data size is estimated at 17
> > TBs.
> > A disaster recovery type of thing. Besides have the backup local another
> > copy is off-site.
> 

> > Main office has several Windows Server 2008 physical servers along with
> > 15-20
> > virtual servers. They are running VM Ware (unknown version). Included in
> > the
> > mix is an Exchange Server (probably 2010), couple SQL Servers (unknown
> > version), file and print and AD. The remote office has a few servers. Each
> > site is on a fiber network but speed is unknown at this time. He is
> > checking.
> 

> > Their previous IT guy just quit so they asked for a proposal to go in and
> > document the network and implementing a remote backup solution. Right now
> > we’re focusing on this backup solution but I’m sure it will change as we
> > get
> > further into our discussions.
> 

> > I could use a couple of enterprise NAS devices or put in a couple of Server
> > 2012 R2 servers as a storage and possibly turn on de-dup to reduce data
> > transfer size.
> 

> > Thanks for the help.
> 

> > Art DeKneef
> 

> > Avanti Computers
> 

> > Mesa, AZ
> 

> > 480-649-4430 Office
> 

> > 480-529-4430 Mobile
> 

-- 
Thanks, 

Joe Matuscak | Director of Technology 
Rohrer Corporation | Office: 330-335-1541 
717 Seville Road | Wadsworth, Ohio 44281 
www.rohrer.com | A Better Package 

Reply via email to