We currently use Symantec as well as Cylance
Thank you, Ray [cid:9FE8CE67-4431-44CD-970D-6A632819929E] Raymond Peng Systems Engineer / IT Operations Direct: 650-577-5399 Email: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Micheal Espinola Jr Sent: Friday, September 15, 2017 1:58 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] Dropping Kaspersky Av, who to replace it with? "Playing with my money^h^h^h^h^hopinion is like playing with my emotions, Smokey." On Sep 15, 2017 8:02 AM, "Erik Goldoff" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Disclaimer, I'm biased because I work for Symantec now (NOT in sales), and know many of you love to hate .... but I was not a fan of early Symantec AV, and would not have come to work for them in the SAV days. I'd give SEP 14 another look, many advanced features, including some exploit protection. Couldn't hurt to download a trialware and test for yourself, and if you still don't like it, you'll have fact based decisions and not opinions and emotions On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 10:34 AM, Michael Leone <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 2:33 PM, Kurt Buff <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 9:31 AM, Michael Leone > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> We use Kaspersky for our AV needs, and to be honest, it's worked out >> well for us. It's certainly caught things that McAfee, our previous AV >> solution, didn't. However, they have this slight problem with being a >> covert arm of the Russian government, apparently .. > > Citation needed. I have not seen anything that supports the idea that > Kaspersky is an arm of the Russian government. Tell that to the US government .. LOL >> So we need to drop them, as the federal agencies are doing. > > Is this a requirement by law/regulation for your departement? If not, > don't drop them, at least not for the reason stated above. My boss says it's not meeting our needs, and it will be replaced, so the requirement is for me to obey orders and keep my job. LOL Listen, I'm happy with Kaspersky, and I would recommend keeping it. But I have an idea that this is a mandate from farther high up. Especially seeing as to how we are a state agency, I guess my CIO doesn't want to spend time explaining to our board of commissioners why the feds are wrong, and we're keeping Kaspersky when they aren't ... > We have Eset, and I'd drop them in a heartbeat, if I could. Not > because it's a bad product of its kind - far from it. It's been fairly > good. > > Instead, I'd go with Applocker, and removing admin privileges - we > already do patching fairly well. The order was for AV, since we need to do local workstations and remote devices. So we will. Also, no one here (including me) knows Applocker, and there's not a lot of support here, besides me, for anything OS or AD related ..
