+ some random rational number. * *
*ASB* *http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker* *Harnessing the Advantages of Technology for the SMB market… * On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Steven M. Caesare <[email protected]>wrote: > 8675309 kinds of awesome.**** > > ** ** > > -sc**** > > ** ** > > *From:* William Robbins [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Friday, September 09, 2011 2:32 PM > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:* Re: DigiNotar compromise**** > > ** ** > > I think this is relevant here: > http://unrforliberty.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/Our-Discussion.jpg > > - WJR > > **** > > On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 10:25, Jonathan Link <[email protected]> > wrote:**** > > No, you argue. And you have a tendency to argue yourself into a corner and > not be able to 1) get out of it or 2) acknowledge that your argument has > trapped you.**** > > **** > > And it's not as if economics is the only area where you've done this.**** > > On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 9:57 AM, Kurt Buff <[email protected]> wrote:**** > > I don't seek perfection. I merely see what's wrong now, and work against > it.**** > > > On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 03:40, Jonathan Link <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Let me know when you find your perfect market, perfect world (as you see > it) > > and then we will talk. > > > > On Thursday, September 8, 2011, Kurt Buff <[email protected]> wrote: > >> No, a free market doesn't presume anything about information being > equally > >> available. Freedom != equality. > >> > >> On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 16:32, Jonathan Link <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> Wrong. > >>> The free market presumes that information is equally available. > >>> And please don't go down the iPhone thread route again. That just got > >>> silly, and you know it. > >>>**** > > >>> On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 6:28 PM, Kurt Buff <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>> And in practice. > >>> > >>> Outside the textbook, laws and regulation which don't respect property > >>> and contract rights robs the market of its ability to make decisions. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 13:28, Andrew S. Baker <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> > >>> >>A free market doesn't guarantee good results, just better results > >>> >> than anything else. > >>> > >>> In theory. Outside of the textbook, the abundant use of free market > >>> often requires regulatory intervention... > >>> > >>> > >>> ASB**** > > >>> http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker <http://xeeme.com/AndrewBaker>**** > > ** ** > > >>> Harnessing the Advantages of Technology for the SMB market… > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Kurt Buff <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>> On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 10:28, Ben Scott <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 11:05 PM, Ken Schaefer <[email protected]> > >>> > wrote: > >>> >>> There's no rule that says that has to happen. It would appear > >>> >>> that most people chose price over security, and so far that has > >>> >>> generally meant that those who value security more are left > >>> >>> without any really satisfying vendor. > >>> >> > >>> >> If there's a market, or even if someone thinks there's a market, > plus > >>> >> a > >>> >> way to make it profitable, then you can bet someone will start > >>> >> something up. > >>> > > >>> > You ignore startup costs, network effects, and other > >>> > barriers-to-entry. > >>> > > >>> > Start, sure. Succeed or see any real adoption? Not so certain. > >>> > The free market is not a panacea. > >>> > >>> A free market doesn't guarantee good results, just better results than > >>> anything else. > >>> > >>> Kurt > >>> > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to [email protected] with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
