"Amer Karim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 01/24/2008 01:32:47 PM:
> The cost of RAM is not the issue ? it?s the fact that one > single product requires the use of 50% of the maximum effective > usable memory of a 32-bit OS. We have SBS 2003 servers out > there which are running everything on them but the coffee > machine, and the cumulative RAM usage on them is less than what > SEP recommends for itself alone on a server. SBS would definitely be a special case - and Symantec SEP would be overkill for an SBS environment too. I use the Small Business suite of Trend for some of the non-profit's I support that run SBS and it works well - more then adequate. For the enterprise, were the extra admin functions that Symantec provides are very nice, a server dedicated to SEP should be a non-issue. Apples to oranges... Eric Eskam =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= The contents of this message are mine personally and do not reflect any position of the U.S. Government "The human mind treats a new idea the same way the body treats a strange protein; it rejects it." - P. B. Medawar ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm> ~
