Don't remember, sorry.

On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 20:56, Erik Goldoff <[email protected]> wrote:
> do you remember what version of ePO ?  The 3.6 and earlier IIRC were MMC
> based, and 4.0 and later (VirusScan 8.5 and newer) were java based.
> Somewhat different animals.
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 11:48 PM, Kurt Buff <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> We found that it didn't actually push the clients out as we wanted -
>> it was quite erratic, and would fail more often than we could tolerate
>> - and was *very* slow to update client definitions.
>>
>> The interface was not intuitive, either.
>>
>> It's been about 3 years since I worked with it, so it might have
>> gotten better, but I still won't recommend it.
>>
>> Kurt
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 18:13, Mathew Shember
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > Really?
>> >
>> > We found ePO rather easy.   What problems did you have with it?
>> >
>> > Vipre wasn't available back then so they went with SEP   ;)
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[email protected]]
>> > Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 5:24 PM
>> > To: NT System Admin Issues
>> > Subject: Re: The Security Earthquake That Nobody Felt
>> >
>> > We had ePO - it was one of the driving reasons for us to abandon it.
>> > The other reason was the unreasonable amount of resources the client
>> > sucked out of the workstations. Yet another reason was the price - we got
>> > VIPRE Enterprise for the renewal price of McAfee, and the renewal price on
>> > VIPRE was hard to beat.
>> >
>> > Hard to say which reason topped the others - kind of a 3-way tie...
>> >
>> > Kurt
>> >
>> > On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 10:56, Mathew Shember
>> > <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> I guess the snark wasn't obvious.
>> >>
>> >> The AV is tolerable as long as you have ePO going.   However, my
>> >> "enlightenment" happened when there was a fast moving version of sdbot 
>> >> which
>> >> snuck by and I had to user higher tiered support.   They identified it 
>> >> with
>> >> Kaspersky.
>> >>
>> >> We were going to use ironmail (another company) but decided against it
>> >> after hearing the announcement.....
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[email protected]]
>> >> Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 4:28 PM
>> >> To: NT System Admin Issues
>> >> Subject: Re: The Security Earthquake That Nobody Felt
>> >>
>> >> Well, yes, actually, and they are part of Intel, and have been
>> >> acquiring companies for themselves - for instance, Secure Computing a few
>> >> years ago, for their Sidewinder firewalls (which are now McAfee Secure
>> >> Enterprise Firewalls), among others.
>> >>
>> >> I still don't like their AV product, but they haven't yet ruined the
>> >> firewall...
>> >>
>> >> Kurt
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 15:57, Mathew Shember
>> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>> Mcafee is stillll in business?
>> >>>
>> >>> ----- Original Message -----
>> >>> From: Stu Sjouwerman [mailto:[email protected]]
>> >>> Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 02:46 PM
>> >>> To: NT System Admin Issues <[email protected]>
>> >>> Subject: The Security Earthquake That Nobody Felt
>> >>>
>> >>>      * The Security Earthquake That Nobody Felt
>> >>>
>> >>> Wow, this is actually major security news. I found this on the blog
>> >>> from Coretrace, and they said: "This week, McAfee, one of the two
>> >>> dominant forces in reactive, blacklist-based endpoint security,
>> >>> actively and unequivocally endorsed Application Whitelisting.
>> >>> Ironically, in hard coverage of Symantec's recent problems with
>> >>> pcAnywhere, the industry is actively recommending application
>> >>> whitelisting too." Here is the link:
>> >>> http://www.coretraceblogs.com/2012-01/security-earthquake-that-nobody
>> >>> - felt-mcafee-endorses-application-whitelisting/
>> >>>
>> >>> So, what is the big news? It turns security on its head. Instead of
>> >>> keeping bad code out, with application whitelisting (also known as
>> >>> Application Control) you only allow known-good code to run. That's
>> >>> really a 180, and very, very interesting from a system admin
>> >>> perspective.
>> >>>
>> >>> I have done some research in this area and have written a whitepaper
>> >>> about whitelisting, and why as a system admin you should look into
>> >>> this for the near future. This is a new security layer for your
>> >>> 'defense-in-depth'. You will hear more from me about whitelisting this
>> >>> year:
>> >>> http://www.knowbe4.com/resources/the-endpoint-security-advantages-of-
>> >>> w hitelisting-a-whitepaper-for-system-administrators/
>> >>>
>> >>> Warm regards,
>> >>>
>> >>> Stu
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~
>> >>> <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>> >>>
>> >>> ---
>> >>> To manage subscriptions click here:
>> >>> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
>> >>> or send an email to [email protected]
>> >>> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~
>> >>> <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>> >>>
>> >>> ---
>> >>> To manage subscriptions click here:
>> >>> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
>> >>> or send an email to [email protected]
>> >>> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~
>> >> <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>> >>
>> >> ---
>> >> To manage subscriptions click here:
>> >> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
>> >> or send an email to [email protected]
>> >> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~
>> >> <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>> >>
>> >> ---
>> >> To manage subscriptions click here:
>> >> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
>> >> or send an email to [email protected]
>> >> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
>> >
>> > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~
>> > <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>> >
>> > ---
>> > To manage subscriptions click here:
>> > http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
>> > or send an email to [email protected]
>> > with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
>> >
>> >
>> > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
>> > ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>> >
>> > ---
>> > To manage subscriptions click here:
>> > http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
>> > or send an email to [email protected]
>> > with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
>>
>> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
>> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>>
>> ---
>> To manage subscriptions click here:
>> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
>> or send an email to [email protected]
>> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
>>
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to [email protected]
> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to [email protected]
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

Reply via email to