Would Windows Intune be a possibility for those remote devices?

 

From: Graeme Carstairs [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2013 12:12 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Keeping 550+ systems maintained

 

You could look at direct access 

As long as the remote machines ate Internet connected they can be managed

 

Usually people may still access the web bit not VPN onto corporate 

 

 



On Friday, 15 March 2013, Ken Schaefer wrote:

So, if I could summarise your requirements, and current state:

 

Machines:


In Office

Remote: once-per-day connectivity

Remote: once-per-month connectivity

Remote: no connectivity


450

~30

~30

~30

 


Requirement

Metric

Compliance


Update AV

Within 24 hours of release

100% of machines. 

Weekly report


Update Acrobat/Java/Firefox/Chrome

Within 14 days of release

100% of machines

Weekly report


Successful Backup

(unsure what the scope is here)

Unsure what the metric is here (Daily? Weekly? Monthly?)

Weekly report


Compliance Report

Weekly

100% coverage

 

If you need to meet 100% compliance (you don't mention meeting, say, 90%
compliance within 1 day, 100% within a week, or dividing machines into
"in-office" vs. "remote") then I think your problem is the infrequently
connected machines (~10% of the fleet), as they don't connect frequently
enough for central enforcement and meeting your turn-around-times. So you
might look at:

a)      A configuration management system that's able to communicate "over
the internet". Could be as simple as a script that runs as a scheduled task
and posts the data back to a web server that you have centrally

b)      Some way of making remote configuration changes (Go-To-Meeting or
something) to enforce updates (if/when required)

 

You could look at using RDS or similar to publish the apps you need to
update within 14 days (except the ones listed all have their own updating
mechanisms). If that's not working well, then Citrix/RDS might be an option,
as at least you can enforce the updating centrally

 

Backup - I'm going to assume that TSM is not going to work for the machines
that do not VPN in, so you need something separate for them.

 

I'd also look at your configuration management procedures, and tighten up
the link between asset lifecycle management -> configuration management ->
AD configuration, to reduce the time being spent on machines that haven't
been removed from AD. You might want to read the ITIL docs to see all the
process areas you should have (not saying you should implement ITIL, but
it'll help with proactive/consistent management of the environment.

 

If you really need to hit the metrics you have above (including proving
compliance), you could be devoting almost an entire FTE to the above.

 

Cheers

Ken

 

 

From: David Lum [mailto:[email protected]
<javascript:_e(%7b%7d,%20'cvml',%20'[email protected]');> ] 
Sent: Friday, 15 March 2013 7:24 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Keeping 550+ systems maintained

 

Excellent questions Ken, thanks. Up to date at this point means 

 

1.       Current (within 1 day) of anti-virus signatures 

2.       Have the latest Acrobat/Java/Firefox/Chrome updates within two
weeks

3.       Successful backups (we use Tivoli to back up endpoints)

4.       Weekly report to confirm the above 

 

Dave

 

 

From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2013 8:01 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Keeping 550+ systems maintained

 

I think you need to know what your requirements are.

 

How do you define "up to date"? e.g. 

-          How quickly do you need to deploy something (or even have a range
of critical/medium/low priority updates)?

-          And how do you need to report compliance (on demand? At pre-set
intervals?)

-          And how do you measure your SLA? E.g. what is an acceptable level
of 'unknown' state devices? And how long can they remain as 'unknown'

 

Once you have an idea of what you need to meet, then you can start to work
out what combination of technologies and people you need to meet it.

 

Cheers

Ken

 

From: David Lum [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Wednesday, 13 March 2013 1:40 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Keeping 550+ systems maintained

 

Scenario: 

*         550 Windows workstations, with 100

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to [email protected]
<javascript:_e(%7b%7d,%20'cvml',%20'[email protected]');
> 
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin



-- 
Good news everyone, you have just received an e-mail from me!

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> 
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to [email protected]
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

Reply via email to