If that is all you want and you have users as Local Admins I would put it at a 
minimum of 2 FTE and would try and get at least 3 or 4.  If you get rid of the 
Local Admin then one or two should be able to keep up with load based on what 
you have to work with for tools. That was just my $0.02, YMMV, etc. Jon
 From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Keeping 550+ systems maintained
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 18:04:24 +0000









I think we have the tools needed (We have KACE that can sit in the DMZ, we have 
an ePO server that agents can check in with currently), I was mainly trying
 to get an FTE estimate 
 


From: Art DeKneef [mailto:[email protected]]


Sent: Friday, March 15, 2013 9:46 AM

To: NT System Admin Issues

Subject: RE: Keeping 550+ systems maintained


 
Would Windows Intune be a possibility for those remote devices?
 
From: Graeme Carstairs [mailto:[email protected]]


Sent: Friday, March 15, 2013 12:12 AM

To: NT System Admin Issues

Subject: Re: Keeping 550+ systems maintained
 
You could look at direct access 

As long as the remote machines ate Internet connected they can be managed


 


Usually people may still access the web bit not VPN onto corporate 


 


 






On Friday, 15 March 2013, Ken Schaefer wrote:



So, if I could summarise your requirements, and current state:
 
Machines:




In Office


Remote: once-per-day connectivity


Remote: once-per-month connectivity


Remote: no connectivity




450


~30


~30


~30




 




Requirement


Metric


Compliance




Update AV


Within 24 hours of release


100% of machines.

Weekly report




Update Acrobat/Java/Firefox/Chrome


Within 14 days of release


100% of machines
Weekly report




Successful Backup
(unsure what the scope is here)


Unsure what the metric is here (Daily? Weekly? Monthly?)


Weekly report




Compliance Report


Weekly


100% coverage




 
If you need to meet 100% compliance (you don’t mention meeting, say, 90% 
compliance within 1 day, 100% within a week, or dividing machines
 into “in-office” vs. “remote”) then I think your problem is the infrequently 
connected machines (~10% of the fleet), as they don’t connect frequently enough 
for central enforcement and meeting your turn-around-times. So you might look 
at:
a)     
A configuration management system that’s able to communicate “over the 
internet”. Could be as simple as a script that runs as a scheduled task and 
posts the data back to a web server that you have centrally
b)     
Some way of making remote configuration changes (Go-To-Meeting or something) to 
enforce updates (if/when required)
 
You could look at using RDS or similar to publish the apps you need to update 
within 14 days (except the ones listed all have their own
 updating mechanisms). If that’s not working well, then Citrix/RDS might be an 
option, as at least you can enforce the updating centrally
 
Backup – I’m going to assume that TSM is not going to work for the machines 
that do not VPN in, so you need something separate for them.
 
I’d also look at your configuration management procedures, and tighten up the 
link between asset lifecycle management -> configuration management
 -> AD configuration, to reduce the time being spent on machines that haven’t 
been removed from AD. You might want to read the ITIL docs to see all the 
process areas you should have (not saying you should implement ITIL, but it’ll 
help with proactive/consistent
 management of the environment.
 
If you really need to hit the metrics you have above (including proving 
compliance), you could be devoting almost an entire FTE to the above.
 
Cheers
Ken
 
 


From: David Lum [mailto:[email protected]]


Sent: Friday, 15 March 2013 7:24 AM

To: NT System Admin Issues

Subject: RE: Keeping 550+ systems maintained


 
Excellent questions Ken, thanks. Up to date at this point means

 
1.      
Current (within 1 day) of anti-virus signatures

2.      
Have the latest Acrobat/Java/Firefox/Chrome updates within two weeks
3.      
Successful backups (we use Tivoli to back up endpoints)
4.      
Weekly report to confirm the above 
 
Dave
 
 


From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:[email protected]]


Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2013 8:01 PM

To: NT System Admin Issues

Subject: RE: Keeping 550+ systems maintained


 
I think you need to know what your requirements are.
 
How do you define “up to date”? e.g. 

-         
How quickly do you need to deploy something (or even have a range of 
critical/medium/low priority updates)?
-         
And how do you need to report compliance (on demand? At pre-set intervals?)
-         
And how do you measure your SLA? E.g. what is an acceptable level of ‘unknown’ 
state devices? And how long can they remain as ‘unknown’
 
Once you have an idea of what you need to meet, then you can start to work out 
what combination of technologies and people you need to meet it.
 
Cheers
Ken
 


From: David Lum [mailto:[email protected]]


Sent: Wednesday, 13 March 2013 1:40 AM

To: NT System Admin Issues

Subject: Keeping 550+ systems maintained


 
Scenario: 
·        
550 Windows workstations, with 100

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~

~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~



---

To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/

or send an email to 
[email protected]

with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin







-- 

Good news everyone, you have just received an e-mail from me!
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~

~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~



---

To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/

or send an email to [email protected]

with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~

~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~



---

To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/

or send an email to [email protected]

with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~

        ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

        

        ---

        To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/

        or send an email to [email protected]

        with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin                                   
  
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to [email protected]
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

Reply via email to