Thanks Salvador, I'll take a look.
 
Joe Heaton
 

________________________________

From: Salvador Manzo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 11:31 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Handling of confidential files



1.      It's an SB1386 best practice.   
2.      Read
http://www.oispp.ca.gov/consumer_privacy/pdf/ssnrecommendations.pdf for
practical details on California Civil Code 1798.85, restricting use on
printed materials, as well as California Labor Code Section 226,
restricting use of the SSN as an employee identifier.
        


On 2/25/08 10:53 AM, "Joe Heaton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



        Salvador,
        
        Don't know that it's being used as an identifier, or simply in
the document.  But, do you have a reference for your statement?  I'm new
to state service, so I'd be very interested in seeing that.  Would give
me something to use as ammunition for getting the SSN out of the
document altogether...
        
        Joe Heaton
        
        
        
________________________________

        From: Salvador Manzo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
        Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 10:07 AM
        To: NT System Admin Issues
        Subject: Re: Handling of confidential files
        
        Considering government agencies aren't even supposed to use SSN
as an identifier in the state of CA...
        
        
        On 2/23/08 3:53 PM, "Don Ely" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
        
        

                Sounds like its time for an anonymous tip to the
state....
                
                On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 8:58 AM, Joe Heaton
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
                 
                

                        I  agree with everything you've said Martin, but
you forget who I work for.   I work for the state, which means that I
use whatever "tool" they  choose, including this homegrown, insecure
spreadsheet.  I'm just  trying to put as much security on it as I can,
and I think that in my  limited ability to make change, the drop folder
is going to be the way to  go.  As I mentioned in my original post, the
timesheets are not just an  internal thing.  They are sent to another
state agency to actually get  the paychecks processed and printed, so
using a 3rd party application  doesn't work, one because it's not "what
the state uses", and two, because  the other agency would have to accept
it, and be able to work with it.   Believe me, I'm not defending how
things are done, I'm simply a pained  cog in the works...
                        
                        Joe Heaton
                        
                        -----Original  Message-----
                        From: Martin Blackstone
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
                        Sent:  Saturday, February 23, 2008 8:40 AM
                        To: NT System Admin  Issues
                        Subject: RE: Handling of confidential files
                        
                        Frankly the  whole process is lame and wrought
with danger.
                        First off, there is zero  acceptable reason for
having the put the SSN in the
                        spreadsheet at  all.
                        HR and payroll processing should already have
that data and  hopefully in a
                        secure location or a secure DB. Any even halfway
decent  payroll application
                        should have all pertinent employee data required
to  process payment already
                        in place. Any employee should and could
rightfully decline to put that
                        information in an email.
                        As for the JPG  signatures, once again, lazy and
inappropriate. I don't want
                        my signature  flying all over the email space
going who knows where. An email
                        saying "I  approve" is as likely to stand up in
any court just as easily as a
                        jpg  signature. Considering the route the
signature takes and the  people
                        having access to it, One could argue that
someone just stole the  file and
                        forged my timesheet.
                        Here is a scenario. I give you my  manager my
timesheet with my jpg sig. You
                        then change my timesheet  (deducting hours) and
pass it on. What good is that
                        signature now? Sure,  it has my name on it, but
you changed it and nobody can
                        really prove it.  Of course the file will show
it was changed, but it would
                        have shown that  anyway since you put your
signature in it.
                        
                        No offense intended Joe,  but this whole process
is nothing but dangerous and
                        ineffective.  Dangerous to staff and the
business as well and has left you
                        open to  substantial risk (see Salvador's
comment regarding CA laws).
                        
                        There  are dozens if not hundreds of available
online timesheet  applications.
                        I'll bet even some open source ones that could
be used to  process the whole
                        thing. It would not most likely be more secure,
but  more effective, save
                        time, and give you great records keeping.  This
isn't reinventing the wheel.
                        
                        -----Original Message-----
                        From: Tim  Evans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
                        Sent:  Saturday, February 23, 2008 8:10 AM
                        To: NT System Admin  Issues
                        Subject: RE: Handling of confidential files
                        
                        Actually, the  newer versions of Excel (2003 &
2007) have pretty good
                        encryption  routines for the spreadsheet itself.
VBA protection sucks. Of
                        course, you  have to choose a good password for
it to do any  good.
                        
                        ...Tim
                        
                        
                        > -----Original Message-----
                        > From:  Matt Plahtinsky
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
                        >  Sent: Friday, February 22, 2008 5:10 PM
                        > To: NT System Admin  Issues
                        > Subject: Re: Handling of confidential files
                        >
                        >  Ss# and email = ss# getting owned.
                        > Password protected .xls is like  wep on
wireless. Its only going to
                        > stop casual snoop.  My boss  had me break a
.xls password last week.
                        > Took less than 30 seconds to  break.
                        >
                        > Matt
                        >
                        >
                        >
                        > On 2/22/08, Durf  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
                        > > You want a "drop"  folder:
                        > >
                        > >
        
http://technet2.microsoft.com/windowsserver/en/library/86987829-3f74-
                        >  412f-abb8-c8b22b07257d1033.mspx?mfr=true
                        > >
                        > > --  Durf
                        > >
                        > > On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 3:21 PM, Joe Heaton
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
                        > wrote:
                        > >
                        > > >   I need some alternatives to a specific
process.  The process  in
                        > question
                        > > > is timesheets.  Our timesheets  are Excel
spreadsheets, which are
                        > processed
                        > > > as  follows:
                        > > >
                        > > > 1)  All timesheets are  located in the
user's home folder.  At the
                        > end of
                        > >  > the month, the user goes in, updates for
the current month,  copies
                        > a .jpg
                        > > of
                        > > > their signature onto  the current month's
sheet, and forwards the
                        > timesheet
                        > >  > to their manager via e-mail attachment.
                        > > > 2)  The  manager opens the timesheets for
their employees, verifies
                        > it,  and
                        > > > copies a .jpg of their signature onto the
current  month's sheet,
                        > and
                        > > > forwards the timesheets to a  specific
admin employee, via e-mail
                        > > > attachments.
                        >  > > 3)  The admin employee takes the
attachments, and copies them  into
                        > > > a folder on a server, from which the
timesheets are  then
                        > "processed" and
                        > > > sent to another agency, to be  further
processed for paycheck
                        > issuance.
                        > > >
                        >  > >
                        > > > My question to my boss, is why can't we
just  have the managers
                        move
                        > the
                        > > > timesheets for their  employees into the
folder on the server,
                        > instead of
                        > >  > e-mailing them a second time.  In fact,
we could have all
                        >  processing done
                        > > > within that folder to begin with, without
having to e-mail the
                        > files
                        > > > anywhere.
                        > >  >
                        > > > The issue that comes up, is how to prevent
someone  from another
                        > department
                        > > > from opening someone  else's timesheet.
The big concern there is
                        > that the
                        >  > > timesheets not only contain .jpgs of
people's signatures, but  also
                        > contain
                        > > > SSNs.
                        > > >
                        > >  > My thought is to set permissions on the
folder so that people  can
                        > place
                        > > > files there, but not be able to open  them
once they are there.  Is
                        > that
                        > > > possible  with NTFS rights?  I will do
research on it, but I'm
                        > hoping  that
                        > > > someone has already run into this type of
issue and  has an answer
                        > already.
                        > > >
                        > > >  Thanks,
                        > > >
                        > > > Joe Heaton
                        > > >  AISA
                        > > > Employment Training Panel
                        > > > 1100 J  Street, 4th Floor
                        > > > Sacramento, CA  95814
                        > >  > (916) 327-5276
                        > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
                        > >  >
                        > > >
                        > > >
                        > >
                        > >
                        >  > --
                        > > --------------
                        > > Give a man a fish, and  he'll eat for a day.
                        > > Give a fish a man, and he'll eat for  weeks!
                        > >
                        > > ~ Upgrade to Next Generation
Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!    ~
                        > > ~
<http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm>
<http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm>    ~
                        >
                        > --
                        > Sent from Gmail for mobile |
mobile.google.com <http://mobile.google.com/>
<http://mobile.google.com/>   
                        >
                        > ~ Upgrade to Next Generation
Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!     ~
                        > ~
<http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm>
<http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm>    ~
                        
                        ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus
with Ninja!     ~
                        ~
<http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm>
<http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm>    ~
                        
                        
                        ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus
with  Ninja!    ~
                        ~
<http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm>
<http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm>    ~
                        
                        No virus found in this incoming message.
                        Checked by AVG  Free Edition.
                        Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.20.9/1294
- Release  Date: 2/22/2008 6:39 PM
                        
                        
                        No virus found in this outgoing  message.
                        Checked by AVG Free Edition.
                        Version: 7.5.516 / Virus  Database:
269.20.9/1294 - Release Date: 2/22/2008 6:39 PM
                        
                        
                        ~  Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus
with Ninja!     ~
                        ~
<http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm>
<http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm>    ~
                        
                        
                        
                        
                        ---
                        Salvador Manzo  [ 620 W. 35th St - Los Angeles,
CA 90089  e. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] 
                        Auxiliary Services IT, Datacenter
                        University of Southern California
                        818-612-5112
                        In matters of style, swim with the current; in
matters of principle, stand like a rock. Thomas Jefferson
                        
                        
                        
                        
                        
                        
                        
                        
                        
                        
                        


-- 
Salvador Manzo  [ 620 W. 35th St - Los Angeles, CA 90089  e.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
Auxiliary Services IT, Datacenter
University of Southern California
818-612-5112
"The secret of happiness is freedom, and the secret of freedom is
courage". 
Pericles' Funeral Oration (431 BC)







~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!    ~
~ <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm>  ~

Reply via email to