Still begs the same question, why use net time on anything newer than a wintendo? W2K's w32time works just fine. It was the first time we actually had a decent native time service with registry based configuration and a management interface. That said, regardless of its quirks, even in the NT era the old timeserv was a quantum leap above net time when you didn't have AD's hierarchical structure and kerberos time requirements.
From: Jon Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 5:28 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Which is the better way Sorry to say this but I got use to it when doing Win 2000 machines. Jon On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 8:19 AM, Ken Schaefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ?!? Why would you use net time is a better question... Cheers Ken From: Jon Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, 27 August 2008 10:10 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Which is the better way Never mind just a differnet way to skin the cat. Jon On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 7:56 AM, Jon Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: You don't use Net Time to do your synchronization? Why not? Jon On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 7:53 AM, Ziots, Edward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: W32tm /config /syncfromflags:DOMHIER W32tm /config /update W32tm /resync /rediscover. Z Edward E. Ziots Network Engineer Lifespan Organization MCSE,MCSA,MCP,Security+,Network+,CCA Phone: 401-639-3505 ________________________________ From: Jon Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 7:52 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Which is the better way ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
