Is this true? Last I had heard, Windows was still using the SNTP subset functionality of NTP - and not fully adhering to the NTP standard.
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 11:43 AM, Troy Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok how about some actual answers :) > > NTP versus SNTP > > If you are running *nix time servers, NTP is a standard and works more > consistently. > > http://blogs.technet.com/industry_insiders/pages/w32-tm-service.aspx > > > -troy > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Free, Bob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 8:32 AM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: RE: Which is the better way > > Still begs the same question, why use net time on anything newer than a > wintendo? W2K's w32time works just fine. It was the first time we actually > had a decent native time service with registry based configuration and a > management interface. That said, regardless of its quirks, even in the NT era > the old timeserv was a quantum leap above net time when you didn't have AD's > hierarchical structure and kerberos time requirements. > > > > From: Jon Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 5:28 AM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: Re: Which is the better way > > > > Sorry to say this but I got use to it when doing Win 2000 machines. > > > > Jon > > On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 8:19 AM, Ken Schaefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ?!? > > > > Why would you use net time is a better question... > > > > Cheers > > Ken > > > > From: Jon Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, 27 August 2008 10:10 PM > > > To: NT System Admin Issues > > Subject: Re: Which is the better way > > > > Never mind just a differnet way to skin the cat. > > > > Jon > > On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 7:56 AM, Jon Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > You don't use Net Time to do your synchronization? Why not? > > > > Jon > > On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 7:53 AM, Ziots, Edward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > W32tm /config /syncfromflags:DOMHIER > > W32tm /config /update > > W32tm /resync /rediscover. > > > > Z > > > > Edward E. Ziots > > Network Engineer > > Lifespan Organization > > MCSE,MCSA,MCP,Security+,Network+,CCA > > Phone: 401-639-3505 > > ________________________________ > > From: Jon Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 7:52 AM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: Which is the better way > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ > ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ > -- ME2 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
