Yes that is the one I used sorry for the typo. It is a long day and not going very well at the moment.
Jon On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 1:35 PM, Kurt Buff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Uh, do you mean us.pool.ntp.org instead? > > On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 10:22 AM, Jon Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What I am trying to do is reset the pDCe to use us.pool.net.org as the > > primary time source. This would be inaddition to several time sources at > > the University that seem to have issues off and on. Since I was at it I > was > > also going to set all my Workgroup servers to use the same list of time > > sources as I do not want them to be any less accurate nor cause myself > any > > issues down the road to remote access. > > > > When you "view" the list of sntp servers with the /querysntp command of > net > > time you get the list of time servers being used by the server. If you > > change the list using w32tm /manualpeerlist:"list of time servers" you > get > > the same list. Unless I have done something wrong it appears the command > > structure that Edward gave me did exactly what I wanted. If something is > > wrong I would love to know about it before it bites me. > > > > Thank you, > > > > Jon > > > > On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 12:27 PM, Free, Bob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> I'm thinking we (at least Ken and I) were misunderstanding what you were > >> trying to say, particularly when you said "You don't use Net Time to do > your > >> synchronization? " > >> > >> > >> > >> When I hear you say "reset" it now sounds like you are using net time to > >> change the configuration, not the synchronization mechanism? Totally > >> different question J > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> From: Jon Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 9:00 AM > >> To: NT System Admin Issues > >> Subject: Re: Which is the better way > >> > >> > >> > >> True and I have switched but it has been a long time since I had to > reset > >> anything like time on my DC's. I might even have used w32tm last time > for > >> all I remember. > >> > >> > >> > >> Jon > >> > >> On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 11:31 AM, Free, Bob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> Still begs the same question, why use net time on anything newer than a > >> wintendo? W2K's w32time works just fine. It was the first time we > actually > >> had a decent native time service with registry based configuration and a > >> management interface. That said, regardless of its quirks, even in the > NT > >> era the old timeserv was a quantum leap above net time when you didn't > have > >> AD's hierarchical structure and kerberos time requirements. > >> > >> > >> > >> From: Jon Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 5:28 AM > >> > >> To: NT System Admin Issues > >> > >> Subject: Re: Which is the better way > >> > >> > >> > >> Sorry to say this but I got use to it when doing Win 2000 machines. > >> > >> > >> > >> Jon > >> > >> On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 8:19 AM, Ken Schaefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> wrote: > >> > >> ?!? > >> > >> > >> > >> Why would you use net time is a better question... > >> > >> > >> > >> Cheers > >> > >> Ken > >> > >> > >> > >> From: Jon Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Sent: Wednesday, 27 August 2008 10:10 PM > >> > >> To: NT System Admin Issues > >> > >> Subject: Re: Which is the better way > >> > >> > >> > >> Never mind just a differnet way to skin the cat. > >> > >> > >> > >> Jon > >> > >> On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 7:56 AM, Jon Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> > >> You don't use Net Time to do your synchronization? Why not? > >> > >> > >> > >> Jon > >> > >> On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 7:53 AM, Ziots, Edward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> wrote: > >> > >> W32tm /config /syncfromflags:DOMHIER > >> > >> W32tm /config /update > >> > >> W32tm /resync /rediscover. > >> > >> > >> > >> Z > >> > >> > >> > >> Edward E. Ziots > >> > >> Network Engineer > >> > >> Lifespan Organization > >> > >> MCSE,MCSA,MCP,Security+,Network+,CCA > >> > >> Phone: 401-639-3505 > >> > >> ________________________________ > >> > >> From: Jon Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 7:52 AM > >> To: NT System Admin Issues > >> Subject: Which is the better way > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ > ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
