Do all your transit switches have knowledge of VLAN3?

Are any of the transit switches "dumb" - i.e. don't support
tagging/trunking?

Is there a Layer3 device somewhere in the transit path to perform
Inter-VLAN routing?

 

Aaron Rohyans 
IT Coordinator, IDC-USA 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  
317.244.8307 (V) 
317.244.4600 (F) 

________________________________

From: Jake Gardner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 10:13 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: vlan tagging

 

All,

I am trying to setup a VLan for multicast traffic (VLan3).  I have a
small workgroup of pcs/equipment generating the traffic into an UNtagged
port on a switch.  I have then passed that traffic Tagged through the
switch stacks and aggregated links to another port in the company.  The
end point is receiving the multicast traffic and is working normally on
the UNtagged VLan1 which is the normal internal traffic.  However, he is
unable to ping back to the pc's in VLan3 or making connection in the
reverse direction.  Is this even possible?   I havn't tested this, but
would it work to UNtag him with VLan3 and then set him Tagged to Vlan1?
Will he be able to communicate to the company network?

 

I am using 3com switches.

 

 

 

Thanks,

 

Jake Gardner

TTC Network Administrator

Ext. 246

 

 

 

 
***Teletronics Technology Corporation*** 
This e-mail is confidential and may also be privileged.  If you are not
the addressee or authorized by the addressee to receive this e-mail, you
may not disclose, copy, distribute, or use this e-mail. If you have
received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by
reply e-mail or by telephone at 267-352-2020 and destroy this message
and any copies.  

Thank you.

*******************************************************************


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

Reply via email to