On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 1:38 AM, Angus Scott-Fleming <[email protected]> wrote: > From my preliminiary investigation it appears only to happen on replies to > original messages which were HTML.
*Bizarre*. Both of your replies in this thread came through fine on my Gmail account here. In the <Del *.bak after 7 days> thread, your recent reply dated <Mon, 09 Feb 2009 23:38:10 -0700> was just BASE64 again, but then your follow-on dated <Mon, 09 Feb 2009 23:59:11 -0700> came through okay. FYI, they show up this way at <www.mail-archive.com>, so it's not just my email account or GMail that's got the issue: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg38468.html http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg38471.html > I wonder if Lyris is doing something to thiese > on the way through based on something obscure in the headers related to the > originals? *Ohhhh*. That's a good thought. I know Lyris appears to reprocess the heck out of the message headers. If your mail client is doing something unusual in its headers, Lyris might well be screwing things up. Lyris does tend to do that. Can you post a copy of the full headers of one of the problematic messages as you sent it? Maybe we can spot something. -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
