One of the reasons I've been willing to live with the lower salary one makes in 
the public sector is that in return, one has great job stability.

Normally.

These days, that has been turned on its head; public sector jobs are providing 
neither stability nor good pay.

I'm just thankful that my job is such that literally no one else in our 
organization can do it, and the things I do absolutely *must* be done. Getting 
rid of me wouldn't save any money, unless they replaced me with someone less 
expensive. And considering how modest my salary is, that's not very likely even 
in the current economic climate.



John Hornbuckle
MIS Department
Taylor County School District
318 North Clark Street
Perry, FL 32347

www.taylor.k12.fl.us<http://www.taylor.k12.fl.us>




From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, March 02, 2009 3:11 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OT - Reduction in hours, forced to use PTO

I work for the state of California, and just narrowly dodged layoffs.  My union 
has agreed to a 4.62% paycut (one day salary), from now through June 2010.  I 
still fear that Ahnold will come back and say it's not enough, and layoffs are 
still needed, but I do have some protection from that now.  Also in the 
Tentative Agreement with the union is that our members cannot be laid off 
unless the agency we work for is eliminated, or the facilities we work at are 
closed.  Even then, because of the agreement, they will give me another job... 
within 10% of my current salary, and within 50 miles of my home.  So, 
theoretically, I could end up taking another 10% cut and increasing my drive to 
work from 6.5 miles to 50...

Joy, oh Joy...hanging on by my fingertips.

Joe Heaton
Employment Training Panel


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

Reply via email to