Also, with a SonicWALLs running at each end-point, it took literally 5 minutes to go through the wizards on each end to build the site-2-site VPN. It was super-easy.
One negative thing that I definately have to throw out there, is that the CMD line interface (if thats you preference) is horrible, and the documentation for it is next to non-existant in terms of truly working with the interface like you would on a Cisco device. If you are partial to a Cisco command-prompt for building configs (like I am), a SonicWALL just might drive you batty until you learn to accept its short-comings. :-) -- ME2 On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Micheal Espinola Jr <[email protected]> wrote: > No experience with that model, but I can say that current SonicWALL > devices are very easy to site-2-site VPN. Their support for me in the > past year has been very easy to deal with. > > -- > ME2 > > > > On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 2:53 PM, Sam Cayze <[email protected]> wrote: >> We may be needing a VPN connection to our remote data center in the near >> future for a small office, about 20 users. >> >> Does anybody have any experience with the Cisco/Linksys RVS4000? I tried a >> SonicWall once, it was way over my head, and support was horrendous. >> >> This will operate solely as 2 VPN endpoints to connect 2 LANs. >> Users needing remote access already have Win 2003 RRAS in place. >> >> Thanks for any input, >> Sam >> >> >> >> >> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/routers/ps9923/ps9928/data_sheet_c78-496735.html >> >> >> >> > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ > ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
