Something to keep in mind is if the device has seperate processing for the encyption. If not, it can impede the overall performance of the device. Again, I'm not familiar with this particular unit, but I've seen other low-end device suffer severly because of the lack of over-all horsepower when handling encrypted traffic.
-- ME2 On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 3:48 PM, Sam Cayze <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks Mike, I am fairly unfamiliar with routers and networking, so I won't > be using any line interfaces! :) I'm looking for easy and familiar, hence > why Linksys was the first place I looked. > > I appreciate the input. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 2:43 PM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: Re: Site to Site VPN? > > Also, with a SonicWALLs running at each end-point, it took literally 5 > minutes to go through the wizards on each end to build the site-2-site VPN. > It was super-easy. > > One negative thing that I definately have to throw out there, is that the CMD > line interface (if thats you preference) is horrible, and the documentation > for it is next to non-existant in terms of truly working with the interface > like you would on a Cisco device. > > If you are partial to a Cisco command-prompt for building configs (like I > am), a SonicWALL just might drive you batty until you learn to accept its > short-comings. :-) > > -- > ME2 > > > > On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Micheal Espinola Jr > <[email protected]> wrote: >> No experience with that model, but I can say that current SonicWALL >> devices are very easy to site-2-site VPN. Their support for me in the >> past year has been very easy to deal with. >> >> -- >> ME2 >> >> >> >> On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 2:53 PM, Sam Cayze <[email protected]> wrote: >>> We may be needing a VPN connection to our remote data center in the >>> near future for a small office, about 20 users. >>> >>> Does anybody have any experience with the Cisco/Linksys RVS4000? I >>> tried a SonicWall once, it was way over my head, and support was horrendous. >>> >>> This will operate solely as 2 VPN endpoints to connect 2 LANs. >>> Users needing remote access already have Win 2003 RRAS in place. >>> >>> Thanks for any input, >>> Sam >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/routers/ps9923/ps9928/data >>> _sheet_c78-496735.html >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ >> <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ >> >> > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ > <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ > > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ > ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
