I'm not sure what size environment Michael is referring to (I didn't see any machine numbers in this chain, but maybe there was another post I missed).
For any reasonable number of servers you'll be looking for a reasonably highly available environment (if incident response becomes dependant on this system). That would involve looking at a cluster for your RMS, a cluster for your SQL Server, multiple management servers/gateways (including some spare for agent failover), NLBed web console machines (if you are using the web console), plus SQL Server reporting services box (which doesn't really have any HA story unfortunately). The number of machines can grow quite quickly... Cheers Ken From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Saturday, 7 March 2009 11:20 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Using System Center for Management of about 700 Windows File Servers Your thoughts? What Brian said. SCOM + SCCM can do this, at a cost of perhaps two to three servers (depending on the size of your data warehouse); which is pretty small for management of that number of servers. I will say this: any enterprise management tool that says "install me and forget me" is lying to you. They all require tuning and attention. From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 3:26 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Using System Center for Management of about 700 Windows File Servers Your thoughts? Three main problems, Configuration Management ( ability to set configuration settings, jobs, etc etc and let them apply to the entire farm from one central console across 5 datacenters) Systems Performance Monitoring ( Instead of me having 6-10 Perfmon mmc's open looking at systems, I set the performance monitor baselines I want to see on the servers and when they go outside the parameters, I am alerted via central console) Eventlog Management and Reporting. ( Need to be able to parse the eventlogs and achive and store them for compliance and security efforts across the farm) Compliance measuring would be a added benefit. HTH Z Edward Ziots Network Engineer Lifespan Organization MCSE,MCSA,MCP+I, ME, CCA, Security +, Network + [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Phone:401-639-3505 ________________________________ From: Brian Desmond [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 3:14 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Using System Center for Management of about 700 Windows File Servers Your thoughts? Well the question I'd ask you is what problem(s) are you trying to solve with this product? Thanks, Brian Desmond [email protected] c - 312.731.3132 Active Directory, 4th Ed - http://www.briandesmond.com/ad4/ Microsoft MVP - https://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/Brian From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 1:52 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Using System Center for Management of about 700 Windows File Servers Your thoughts? Importance: High We are having Microsoft coming in to talk with us about Systems Center for Management of our ever-growing server farm, for those using it, please feel free to give me your pro's con's and tales from the trenches on what this platform said it will do, and what it really does when the rubber hits the road. My Mix of servers are ½ physical ½ virtual, SQL (2000/2005), IIS (5&6), File and Print (2000-2008), DC's (2003), Application servers ( 3rd party) (2000/2003) TVK, I especially want to hear your thoughts on this subject, since this is your MVP realm and you tend to know the most about the features and functionality. TIA in advance, Z Edward Ziots Network Engineer Lifespan Organization MCSE,MCSA,MCP+I, ME, CCA, Security +, Network + [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Phone:401-639-3505 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
