Cant' get rid of the Win9x machines. we're using them as cheap AS/400 terminals. That sort of thing requires very little resources, both CPU and memory-wise. that's why an old Win9x machine is perfect for that job. J
John-AldrichTile-Tools From: Jonathan Link [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 8:17 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Conficker & Win9x You would be suprised... On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 3:04 AM, James Rankin <[email protected]> wrote: Given the attack vector of the initial vulnerability in the Server service, I'd say probably not - although if they have network shares, they may get attacked by the payload of the virus rather than the actual exploit. I would definitely say it is time to get rid of the 9x systems though. I thought I'd heard the last of those! :-) 2009/3/31 John Aldrich <[email protected]> Are Windows 9x vulnerable to Conficker or is it just nt-based versions of Windows? John-AldrichTile-Tools No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.5.285 / Virus Database: 270.11.35/2034 - Release Date: 04/01/09 06:06:00 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
<<image001.jpg>>
<<image002.jpg>>
