or use Windows Fundamentals http://www.microsoft.com/licensing/sa/benefits/fundamentals.mspx
2009/4/1 John Aldrich <[email protected]> > Cant’ get rid of the Win9x machines… we’re using them as cheap AS/400 > terminals… That sort of thing requires very little resources, both CPU and > memory-wise… that’s why an old Win9x machine is perfect for that job. J > > > > [image: John-Aldrich][image: Tile-Tools] > > > > *From:* Jonathan Link [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Wednesday, April 01, 2009 8:17 AM > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:* Re: Conficker & Win9x > > > > You would be suprised... > > On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 3:04 AM, James Rankin <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Given the attack vector of the initial vulnerability in the Server service, > I'd say probably not - although if they have network shares, they may get > attacked by the payload of the virus rather than the actual exploit. > > I would definitely say it is time to get rid of the 9x systems though. I > thought I'd heard the last of those! :-) > > 2009/3/31 John Aldrich <[email protected]> > > > > Are Windows 9x vulnerable to Conficker or is it just nt-based versions of > Windows? > > > > [image: John-Aldrich][image: Tile-Tools] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 8.5.285 / Virus Database: 270.11.35/2034 - Release Date: 04/01/09 > 06:06:00 > > > > > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
<<image002.jpg>>
<<image001.jpg>>
