That duet was an unholy union!


-----Original Message-----
From: Don Guyer [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 2:58 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)

....who along with David Bowie (who???) did one of the best Xmas songs ever...

:)

Don Guyer
Systems Engineer - Information Services
Prudential, Fox & Roach/Trident Group
431 W. Lancaster Avenue
Devon, PA 19333
Direct: (610) 993-3299
Fax: (610) 650-5306
[email protected]


-----Original Message-----
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 2:56 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)

Nah - to me it sounds like some really old guy from Spokane - a
singer/actor the younger folks here won't remember...

Kurt

On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 09:39, Kim Longenbaugh <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Bing, bing, bing���������.Ricochet Rabbit!
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 11:28 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)
>
>
>
> I have to admit, I think they chose the name poorl�������� Google sounded a 
> bit silly to begin with too, but "bing" is not a positive word association 
> for me.
>
> I'd be really interested to know what research went into choosing this name 
> and what the results were. I'm certainly not the average user, but I'm 
> interested to know who is.
>
> I wonder if this was chosen internally by Microsoft or one of their 
> marketing/ad agencies...
>
> --
> ME2
>
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Sam Cayze <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Bing reminds me of one of those spammy landing pages for a misspelled URL.
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: John Aldrich [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 11:13 AM
>
> To: NT System Admin Issues
>
> Subject: RE: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)
>
> Interesting. Seemed to me that Google loaded a bit faster than Bing. Guess I 
> know which on����������������m going to (keep) using. J
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 11:50 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)
>
>
>
> http://www.bing-vs-google.com/?q=%22death+star%22
>
> --
> ME2
>
>
>
>
>
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 8.5.375 / Virus Database: 270.12.87/2195 - Release Date: 06/22/09 
> 06:54:00
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~



NOTICE: Florida has a broad public records law. Most written communications to 
or from this entity are public records that will be disclosed to the public and 
the media upon request. E-mail communications may be subject to public 
disclosure.


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

Reply via email to