Both of our offices each have a full Internet T1. That should suffice right? At 
our main office it stays at about 1Mb of traffic through out the day. The 
remote location has plenty of space on its T.
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Brian Desmond 
  To: NT System Admin Issues 
  Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 2:34 PM
  Subject: RE: domain/forest setup question


  It has side effects that change behaviors of other features. 
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx/kb/871159 

   

  While I can't say for certain, my feeling is that the demographic on this 
list is unlikely to be in a scenario where they have a WAN that constrains 
having a locally placed GC. 

   

  Thanks,

  Brian Desmond

  [email protected]

   

  c - 312.731.3132

   

  Active Directory, 4th Ed - http://www.briandesmond.com/ad4/

  Microsoft MVP - https://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/Brian

   

  From: Richard Stovall [mailto:[email protected]] 
  Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 12:23 PM
  To: NT System Admin Issues
  Subject: RE: domain/forest setup question

   

  Out of curiosity, why?

   

  From: Brian Desmond [mailto:[email protected]] 
  Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 1:20 PM
  To: NT System Admin Issues
  Subject: RE: domain/forest setup question

   

  Please don't use UGC.

   

  Thanks,

  Brian Desmond

  [email protected]

   

  c - 312.731.3132

   

  Active Directory, 4th Ed - http://www.briandesmond.com/ad4/

  Microsoft MVP - https://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/Brian

   

  From: Richard Stovall [mailto:[email protected]] 
  Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 11:17 AM
  To: NT System Admin Issues
  Subject: RE: domain/forest setup question

   

  Don't forget to include a GC at both sites or use Universal group caching.

   

  From: Jon Harris [mailto:[email protected]] 
  Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 12:12 PM
  To: NT System Admin Issues
  Subject: Re: domain/forest setup question

   

  Personally I would set up sites and just have a single domain.  It sounds 
like seperate forests/domains is just making it harder to manage.a RODC at that 
site would work well if you are use 2008 for all the DC's.

   

  Jon

  On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 12:08 PM, James Kerr <[email protected]> wrote:

  Overall, I'm always looking to make things easier to manage.

  The new DC is replacing the single DC they have at that location that is 
going on 5 years old. When it was the originally put there we did not have any 
VPN connection between the two locations.

  The main office has about 80 users and the smaller has about 40 but will soon 
be about 50. The server at the moment really only provides file and print 
services. WSUS and AV and Exchnage come from the main location. At some point I 
would like to run a sharepoint for the whole company.


  ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steven M. Caesare" <[email protected]>
  To: "NT System Admin Issues" <[email protected]>
  Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 11:27 AM
  Subject: RE: domain/forest setup question 




  What are you trying to accomplish: 1)overall, and 2) with the new DC?

  -sc

    -----Original Message-----
    From: James Kerr [mailto:[email protected]]
    Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 11:19 AM
    To: NT System Admin Issues
    Subject: domain/forest setup question

    I would like to hear some input into an upcoming change I have to make
    to
    our network. Currently we have two locations each domain is a separate
    forest but we have domain trusts. The locations are connected via a

  VPN

  and
  their both on a separate subnet I'm going to be installing a new DC at
  the
  smaller location and I'm debating whether I should keep the forests
  separate
  or same forest different domains or just make the new DC a member of
  our
  existing domain at the main location. It seems to me that adding to

  the

  existing domain would be the easiest to manage and probably the best
  way to
  go right? Any downsides to the last option?

  James


  ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
  ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~


  ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
  ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~


  ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
  ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

   

   

  

  

  

 


 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

Reply via email to