No the way the Sidebar is setup is nice I don't think the users will object
to it.  The taskbar will present another training issue but most of the
users don't even think of it or notice it much.  I will show this setup to a
few people Tuesday and see if any of them want to try being a tester.

Jon

On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 9:52 PM, Ken Schaefer <[email protected]> wrote:

>  Perhaps Jon is referring to the changes in Task Bar appearance/behaviour?
> Or Sidebar gadgets?
>
>
>
> Otherwise, I don’t think there are any major differences that upset people.
> A few things have moved, and there are a few extra added bits-n-pieces (e.g.
> “New Folder” button) that I think most people will appreciate.
>
>
> Cheers
> Ken
>
>
>
> *From:* Brian Desmond [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Sent:* Monday, 17 August 2009 9:34 AM
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* RE: Windows 7
>
>
>
> *What’s different to you about Explorer that you think will have adoption
> issues? My main travel laptop has Win7 on it and I am comparing it to my
> WS08 workstation and it seems roughly the same? There are some extra root
> node odds and ends that I haven’t looked at at-all on the tree but seems
> fundamentally about the same? I may just be missing something though –
> dunno. *
>
> * *
>
> *Thanks,*
>
> *Brian Desmond*
>
> *[email protected]*
>
> * *
>
> *c - 312.731.3132*
>
> * *
>
> *From:* Jon Harris [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Sent:* Sunday, August 16, 2009 8:06 PM
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Windows 7
>
>
>
> I have my first Windows 7 x64 Enterprise client up and running.  I have
> added the RSAT for 7 RTM, and the System Center Essentials Console as well.
> Office Enterprise 2007 and a couple of more applications like Forefront
> Client Security.  I have run into on issue that may be just a bug in my
> setup or something more but I can only get 2 Hotmail accounts configured.
> Under Vista I had three.  System Center Essentials can not deploy a client
> to this system but I have just started looking at the issues.
>
>
>
> Other than what I have mentioned so far I see a big differences in the GUI
> (think some users will like it others will dislike it but all will need
> training).  The load time is much faster to get to the login but about the
> same to get to a useable desktop but I have not really done any timing of
> the loads.  The ability to load Bluetooth devices as in they are ready at
> the login prompt, very sweet.  Cisco AnyConnect works a bit faster but we
> will see if it stays that way.  Windows Explorer GUI is a major change and I
> think the users will hate it.  The Firewall GUI has been changed big time
> but I think this is a good change.  It is easier to see what applications
> are permitted under which of 3 network conditions.  You can make changes but
> at the moment I need to be the Administrator to make the changes (users are
> permitted to allow exceptions by GPO).  All of this within about 2 hours of
> loading and starting work with if.  Loading the OS (scratch load), loading
> the Vista drivers, and loading all the applications took about 12 hours in
> total with about 2 to 3 of those hours spent transfering files from a USB
> drive.  I did all the patching off domain and only put the machine into the
> domain after it was loaded with programs/applications but before any AV or
> personal files.  Adding it to the domain and getting it configured with AV
> was just as fast as with Vista or faster.  Windows Update Services seems to
> be a bit faster.
>
>
>
> Jon Harris
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

Reply via email to