Cool! -ASB
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 5:44 PM, Jon Harris <[email protected]> wrote: > Sorry Andrew you do not have to be at 2003 level. I am at the 2000 native > mode only and everything is fine and dandy. > > Jon > > On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 5:40 PM, Andrew S. Baker <[email protected]>wrote: > >> *Yes, *You need to be at 2003 Native level... *NO, *you will not need to >> re-add machines to the domain... and, *YES, *you will be able to add the >> 2008 server as a DC without making it take over all the roles. >> >> Why do you want to add a 2008 server as a DC? >> >> -ASB >> >> >> >> On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 5:30 PM, andy <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> A couple of questions on 2008 domains. >>> We have a backward compatible 2003 domain, and we cannot add a 2008 >>> domain controller. I suspect that it is because we are running the 2003 >>> domain in 2000 compatibility mode. >>> If we upgrade to a full 2003 domain ,will we have to readd all of the >>> computers to the domain or will they still work without removing and >>> readding to the domain? Most of the information I have found online is >>> going from 2000 to higher domains. >>> We have all xp machines and 2003 servers. >>> If we are running in full 2003 mode, will I be able to add the 2008 as a >>> additional domain controller, or will it have to be the primary? >>> >>> Andy >>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
