On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 10:19, Ben Scott <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 12:32 PM, Kurt Buff <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Not that bad...
>>
>> What a ringing endorsement! Heh.
>
>  You left out "... if you're coming from BSD".  I took tat as more of
> a comment that a Windows-only guy who can't live without a mouse would
> be lost.  That would be my take as well.  CentOS ain't BSD, but it's
> got far more in common than it has apart.  Moving from one to the
> other should be pretty easy.

True enough - it just struck me as funny.

>  The biggest difference (for purposes of this conversation) would be
> the firewall stuff.  Linux has its own thing (called "iptables" and
> "netfilter"), while the BSDs have pf/ipfw/ipfilter.  Unfortunately,
> iptables uses very different syntax vs *pf*.  I haven't used the BSD
> firewall stuff much, but my impression was that it was superior to
> Linux.  I think Linux has finally caught up in terms of functionality,
> but the syntax is still cleaner with BSD.  Still, Linux can do the job
> well for most things, so it's usually not a deal-breaker.

I like pf, dammit. It's the real reason I don't want to leave BSD.
Well, almost true. I had tried several Linux distros before 2000 and
was dissatisfied by all of them, then was hired by a now-defunct
company that was basing their product on FreeBSD, and never looked
back. Heck, I even wiped SLED from the T61 I'm using now.

>  You may want to check out Gentoo, which I'm told is basically a
> Linux built like a BSD.  They use "ports" and everything.  Hardware
> support for one distro often means hardware support for another is
> trivial.  (It depends on whether they used a portable kernel interface
> or not.)  So the fact that Sangoma works with Fedora may well mean it
> can be made to work with Gentoo with minimal effort.
>
> -- Ben

I'll check that out.

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

Reply via email to