+1 (Although I think I saw someone mention in a prior thread that admin rights weren't required to update FF so long as the user had modify rights to the install folder...)
John Hornbuckle MIS Department Taylor County School District www.taylor.k12.fl.us -----Original Message----- From: Marc Maiffret [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Saturday, November 21, 2009 8:42 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Firefox for corporate use? Not specific to your question but I thought I would mention anyways... I am asked at conferences all the time if FireFox is a secure alternative to IE and while I explain they are rather equal I more importantly ask which of the two products will work with your current patch management and update process? And if your idea of updating is having your users running as administrator updating FireFox themselves, well godspeed my sons. This is similar in response to people whom ask me if they should switch to using Mac's because they are not doing well managing a Windows environment. -Marc Maiffret www.marcmaiffret.com On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 8:31 AM, Jon D <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm wondering if anyone here has changed their users default browser > firm wide to firefox? > If so, any issues to note? > Any regrets? > > Thanks in advance, > Jon ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ NOTICE: Florida has a broad public records law. Most written communications to or from this entity are public records that will be disclosed to the public and the media upon request. E-mail communications may be subject to public disclosure. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
