It's definitely not the only issue; I had mentioned in another message that my prior research had shown IE to be much more customizable via Group Policy, for example (although again that may have changed since I last looked into it).
John -----Original Message----- From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Sunday, November 22, 2009 7:19 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Firefox for corporate use? -----Original Message----- From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Sunday, 22 November 2009 7:25 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Firefox for corporate use? > (Although I think I saw someone mention in a prior thread that admin > rights weren't required to update FF so long as the user had modify > rights to the install folder...) Surely this is only part of the issue of ongoing management though. Can you accurately report on versions in use? Can all your users get to the FF update servers (if you don't have Altiris/SCCM to deploy these updates)? How do you force your users to update? etc. Cheers Ken ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ NOTICE: Florida has a broad public records law. Most written communications to or from this entity are public records that will be disclosed to the public and the media upon request. E-mail communications may be subject to public disclosure. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
