I agree but you asked which vendor would we look at IF Vipre was not available. I did not want to imply that NOD32 was my first choice either. It is simply on my short list. I have had enough issues with McAfee and Symantec in the past where either they cost me time or allowed bugs through to keep them off the short list. I have had set up issues with ForeFront but it is getting a major rewrite that I would be keeping it on my short list. I had similar setup issues with NOD32 but I could live with set up issues I can't put up with letting bugs through or killing machines during updates.
Jon On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 8:58 AM, Steve Kelsay <[email protected]> wrote: > Our problem with eset was there implosion of tech support. After getting > status messages of “I don't know how to handle that object” and no response > from their tech support, we determined them to be non-responsive. They did > not let a threat though, but really, how could we tell with status messages > like that and no one to tell me what that meant? > > > > The first subscription we had with them, they were wonderful. Then the > second renewal period, they collapsed on us. That was when we went with > Vipre. > > > > *From:* Jon Harris [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Friday, December 11, 2009 8:52 PM > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:* Re: Vipre Competition > > > > Personally I would want to look at the new Forefront and v 3 NOD before I > made any decisions if Vipre is not available. > > > > Jon > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 10:32 AM, Steve Kelsay <[email protected]> wrote: > > OK. If for some reason, we cannot use Vipre (which is my choice at this > point), what is the second best choice of AV/Anti Malware attacks? > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ > ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ > > > > > > > > > > > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
