Could I have a little help with the subinacl syntax. I thinking this is right if I want to take ownership but I have something wrong. suninacl /subdirectories /setowner=domain\user "path"
________________________________ From: James Rankin [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2010 8:29 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Taking ownership of User Dir on vista hard drive I've seen some really scragged permissions sets down the years. Sometimes a brute-force combo of subinacl and cacls is the only way to bang them into submission. 2010/1/14 N Parr <[email protected]> not yet, tried the takeown utility in vista and it didn't work. I can get in the the user folder but there are sub folders like my docs that it won't give me access to. ________________________________ From: James Rankin [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2010 2:41 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Taking ownership of User Dir on vista hard drive Have you tried using subinacl? 2010/1/13 N Parr <[email protected]> I've never had issues with this before but this one has me stumped. I have a drive out of a users vista pc that died. In the past I've been able to take ownership of the users or Doc/settings dir and get the files copied off but for some reason this one won't let me. I can try to take ownership but it won't do it. Tried on an XP and Vista machine. Google is failing me, any ideas? -- "On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question." -- "On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question." ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
