To me, that just show that MS have a gaping big hole in their test plans.
As a lot of organisations are still on IPv4 and don't use IPv6, to me not 
testing the effects of disabling IPv6 is a major fail.

It's a bit like "We won't test it on a 32-bit OS, because we want everyone 
to use 64-bit."

Regards

Tony Patton
Desktop Operations Cavan
Ext 8078
Direct Dial 049 435 2878
email: [email protected]



From:
"Free, Bob" <[email protected]>
To:
"NT System Admin Issues" <[email protected]>
Date:
18/02/2010 21:25
Subject:
RE: What is the latest version of RDP client for Win7?



The Argument against Disabling IPv6
It is unfortunate that some organizations disable IPv6 on their computers 
running Windows Vista or Windows Server 2008, where it is installed and 
enabled by default. Many disable IPv6-based on the assumption that they 
are not running any applications or services that use it. Others might 
disable it because of a misperception that having both IPv4 and IPv6 
enabled effectively doubles their DNS and Web traffic. This is not true.
 
>From Microsoft's perspective, IPv6 is a mandatory part of the Windows 
operating system and it is enabled and included in standard Windows 
service and application testing during the operating system development 
process. Because Windows was designed specifically with IPv6 present, 
Microsoft does not perform any testing to determine the effects of 
disabling IPv6. If IPv6 is disabled on Windows Vista, Windows Server 2008, 
or later versions, some components will not function. Moreover, 
applications that you might not think are using IPv6?such as Remote 
Assistance, HomeGroup, DirectAccess, and Windows Mail?could be.
 
Therefore, Microsoft recommends that you leave IPv6 enabled, even if you 
do not have an IPv6-enabled network, either native or tunneled. By leaving 
IPv6 enabled, you do not disable IPv6-only applications and services (for 
example, HomeGroup in Windows 7 and DirectAccess in Windows 7 and Windows 
Server 2008 R2 are IPv6-only) and your hosts can take advantage of 
IPv6-enhanced connectivity.
 
http://207.46.16.252/en-us/magazine/2009.07.cableguy.aspx
 
 
 
From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 1:05 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: What is the latest version of RDP client for Win7?
 
I?ve had IPv6 disabled on several Win2K8 servers as well without problem 
as far as I can tell also.
 
-sc
 
From: Carl Houseman [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 3:04 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: What is the latest version of RDP client for Win7?
 
I've had IPV6 disabled on Vista since forever and have never had any 
issues talking to my WSUS server.
 
More than likely "they" had something else going on and accidentally fixed 
it at the same time they re-enabled IPV6.
 
Carl
 
From: Jon Harris [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 3:00 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: What is the latest version of RDP client for Win7?
 
I would add Vista and 7 as well but I have not done a lot of testing on 
that issue.  I know some of the products like WSUS were having an issue 
with Vista clients not having IP6 turned on.  I don't remember what the 
issue was but they had problems connecting reliably to the server.
 
Jon
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 2:36 PM, Free, Bob <[email protected]> wrote:
Yes bad on any 2008 server
 
From: Sam Cayze [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 6:15 AM 

To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: What is the latest version of RDP client for Win7?
 
Can you answer this:  Is it bad to do it on any 2008 machine, or just a 
2008 machine that will host Exchange?
 
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 7:22 AM 

To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: What is the latest version of RDP client for Win7?
 
There are known problems with doing so. And, unfortunately, before you ask 
me what they are ? I?m not allowed to say.
 
Regards,
 
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
 
From: Sam Cayze [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 8:18 AM 

To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: What is the latest version of RDP client for Win7?
 
Ok!  I?ll try to find it again.
 
Curious though, as to why it?s such a bad idea?
 
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 6:15 AM 

To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: What is the latest version of RDP client for Win7?
 
Sam ?
 
DON?T DO THAT.  Dramatic enough? :-)
 
And like Carl asked, I?m interested to know where you read it. ?Cuz I?ll 
try to get it fixed.
 
Regards,
 
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
 
From: Carl Houseman [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 10:37 PM 

To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: What is the latest version of RDP client for Win7?
 
Where'd you read that?
 
From: Sam Cayze [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 10:33 PM 

To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: What is the latest version of RDP client for Win7?
 
IP6 is disabled on the NIC(s).   Something I read to do when introducing 
Ex2010 into an IPv4 environment.
 
From: Free, Bob [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 4:20 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: What is the latest version of RDP client for Win7?
 
What do you mean by ip4 only?
 
From: Sam Cayze [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 8:45 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: What is the latest version of RDP client for Win7?
 
Having a terrible time getting an RDP session open to my first Srv08 
server.  Works 50% of the time.  Have to fire up the VMware Console to 
connect.  Once I log in through the console, I can then connect to the 
Srv08.
 
Firewall is disabled.  ip4 only.
 
???
 

From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 10:41 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: What is the latest version of RDP client for Win7?
That?s the same version I have (Win7 ultimate x64).
 
Regards,
 
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
 
From: Sam Cayze [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 11:35 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: What is the latest version of RDP client for Win7?
 
I have 6.1.7600; thought 7.x was out...
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

====================================================================
http://www.quinn-insurance.com

This e-mail is intended only for the addressee named above. The contents
should not be copied nor disclosed to any other person. Any views or
opinions expressed are solely those of the sender and
do not necessarily represent those of QUINN-Insurance, unless otherwise
specifically stated . As internet communications are not secure,
QUINN-Insurance is not responsible for the contents of this message nor
responsible for any change made to this message after it was sent by the
original sender. Although virus scanning is used on all inbound and
outbound e-mail, we advise you to carry out your own virus check before
opening any attachment. We cannot accept liability for any damage sustained
as a result of any software viruses.

====================================================================

QUINN-Life Direct Limited is regulated by the Financial Regulator.
QUINN-Insurance Limited is regulated by the Financial Regulator and
regulated by the Financial Services Authority for the conduct of UK
business.

====================================================================

QUINN-Life Direct Limited is registered in Ireland, registration number
292374 and is a private company limited by shares.
QUINN-Insurance Limited is registered in Ireland, registration number
240768 and is a private company limited by shares.
Both companies have their head office at Dublin Road, Cavan, Co. Cavan.


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

Reply via email to