Good job Kurt.

-sc

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Friday, February 19, 2010 2:31 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: What is the latest version of RDP client for Win7?
> 
> NetBIOS Extended User Interface
> 
> Cheers
> Ken
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Friday, 19 February 2010 2:02 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: What is the latest version of RDP client for Win7?
> 
> I'll give you a dollar if you can tell me what NetBEUI stands for without
> looking it up.
> 
> I'll double that if you can tell me the code name for MS's Gateway Services
> for NetWare was while under development.
> 
> And if you cheat and look em up u r l...@m3.
> 
> -sc
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 9:58 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: What is the latest version of RDP client for Win7?
> 
> Weren't you still on NetBEUI just last week?
> 
> Heh.
> 
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 17:52, Steven M. Caesare <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > I’ll probably no longer do so either, but I’ve run Windows without
> > protocol stacks installed/bound previously, and if there’s a
> > dependency, I’d like to see it documented.
> >
> >
> >
> > Otherwise there shouldn’t be a checkbox next to the protocol that
> > makes it just as easy to disable as File and Print sharing, which you
> > can disable with relative impunity.
> >
> >
> >
> > -sc
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Free, Bob [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 8:41 PM
> > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: What is the latest version of RDP client for Win7?
> >
> >
> >
> > I think that’s expected as it’s the party line from a Microsoft Techwriter.
> > I believe it gets the point across. With what I heard from the PFE
> > that I can’t elaborate on, what Michael alluded and a few other cases
> > I’ve heard of I’m not going to risk disabling it on my servers. It’s not 
> > worth
> it.
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 4:12 PM
> > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: What is the latest version of RDP client for Win7?
> >
> >
> >
> > That’s unfortunately nebulous.
> >
> >
> >
> > -sc
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Free, Bob [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 4:24 PM
> > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: What is the latest version of RDP client for Win7?
> >
> >
> >
> > The Argument against Disabling IPv6
> >
> > It is unfortunate that some organizations disable IPv6 on their
> > computers running Windows Vista or Windows Server 2008, where it is
> > installed and enabled by default. Many disable IPv6-based on the
> > assumption that they are not running any applications or services that
> > use it. Others might disable it because of a misperception that having
> > both IPv4 and IPv6 enabled effectively doubles their DNS and Web traffic.
> This is not true.
> >
> >
> >
> > From Microsoft's perspective, IPv6 is a mandatory part of the Windows
> > operating system and it is enabled and included in standard Windows
> > service and application testing during the operating system development
> process.
> > Because Windows was designed specifically with IPv6 present, Microsoft
> > does not perform any testing to determine the effects of disabling
> > IPv6. If IPv6 is disabled on Windows Vista, Windows Server 2008, or
> > later versions, some components will not function. Moreover,
> > applications that you might not think are using IPv6—such as Remote
> > Assistance, HomeGroup, DirectAccess, and Windows Mail—could be.
> >
> >
> >
> > Therefore, Microsoft recommends that you leave IPv6 enabled, even if
> > you do not have an IPv6-enabled network, either native or tunneled. By
> > leaving IPv6 enabled, you do not disable IPv6-only applications and
> > services (for example, HomeGroup in Windows 7 and DirectAccess in
> > Windows 7 and Windows Server 2008 R2 are IPv6-only) and your hosts can
> > take advantage of IPv6-enhanced connectivity.
> >
> >
> >
> > http://207.46.16.252/en-us/magazine/2009.07.cableguy.aspx
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 1:05 PM
> > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: What is the latest version of RDP client for Win7?
> >
> >
> >
> > I’ve had IPv6 disabled on several Win2K8 servers as well without
> > problem as far as I can tell also.
> >
> >
> >
> > -sc
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Carl Houseman [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 3:04 PM
> > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: What is the latest version of RDP client for Win7?
> >
> >
> >
> > I've had IPV6 disabled on Vista since forever and have never had any
> > issues talking to my WSUS server.
> >
> >
> >
> > More than likely "they" had something else going on and accidentally
> > fixed it at the same time they re-enabled IPV6.
> >
> >
> >
> > Carl
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Jon Harris [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 3:00 PM
> > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > Subject: Re: What is the latest version of RDP client for Win7?
> >
> >
> >
> > I would add Vista and 7 as well but I have not done a lot of testing
> > on that issue.  I know some of the products like WSUS were having an
> > issue with Vista clients not having IP6 turned on.  I don't remember
> > what the issue was but they had problems connecting reliably to the
> server.
> >
> >
> >
> > Jon
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 2:36 PM, Free, Bob <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Yes bad on any 2008 server
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Sam Cayze [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 6:15 AM
> >
> > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: What is the latest version of RDP client for Win7?
> >
> >
> >
> > Can you answer this:  Is it bad to do it on any 2008 machine, or just
> > a 2008 machine that will host Exchange?
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 7:22 AM
> >
> > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: What is the latest version of RDP client for Win7?
> >
> >
> >
> > There are known problems with doing so. And, unfortunately, before you
> > ask me what they are – I’m not allowed to say.
> >
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> >
> >
> > Michael B. Smith
> >
> > Consultant and Exchange MVP
> >
> > http://TheEssentialExchange.com
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Sam Cayze [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 8:18 AM
> >
> > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: What is the latest version of RDP client for Win7?
> >
> >
> >
> > Ok!  I’ll try to find it again.
> >
> >
> >
> > Curious though, as to why it’s such a bad idea…
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 6:15 AM
> >
> > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: What is the latest version of RDP client for Win7?
> >
> >
> >
> > Sam –
> >
> >
> >
> > DON’T DO THAT.  Dramatic enough? :-)
> >
> >
> >
> > And like Carl asked, I’m interested to know where you read it. ‘Cuz
> > I’ll try to get it fixed.
> >
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> >
> >
> > Michael B. Smith
> >
> > Consultant and Exchange MVP
> >
> > http://TheEssentialExchange.com
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Carl Houseman [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 10:37 PM
> >
> > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: What is the latest version of RDP client for Win7?
> >
> >
> >
> > Where'd you read that?
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Sam Cayze [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 10:33 PM
> >
> > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: What is the latest version of RDP client for Win7?
> >
> >
> >
> > IP6 is disabled on the NIC(s).   Something I read to do when
> > introducing
> > Ex2010 into an IPv4 environment.
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Free, Bob [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 4:20 PM
> > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: What is the latest version of RDP client for Win7?
> >
> >
> >
> > What do you mean by ip4 only?
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Sam Cayze [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 8:45 AM
> > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: What is the latest version of RDP client for Win7?
> >
> >
> >
> > Having a terrible time getting an RDP session open to my first Srv08
> > server.  Works 50% of the time.  Have to fire up the VMware Console to
> > connect.  Once I log in through the console, I can then connect to the
> > Srv08.
> >
> >
> >
> > Firewall is disabled.  ip4 only.
> >
> >
> >
> > ???
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> >
> > From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 10:41 AM
> > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: What is the latest version of RDP client for Win7?
> >
> > That’s the same version I have (Win7 ultimate x64).
> >
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> >
> >
> > Michael B. Smith
> >
> > Consultant and Exchange MVP
> >
> > http://TheEssentialExchange.com
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Sam Cayze [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 11:35 AM
> > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > Subject: What is the latest version of RDP client for Win7?
> >
> >
> >
> > I have 6.1.7600; thought 7.x was out...
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~
> <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
> 
> 
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~
> <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
> 
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~
> <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

Reply via email to