Not many people have used SNA... we did as part of Back Office to attach to an AS/400 and System/36. Oof.
The code name for the Novell gateway product, which was deigned to "prostitute NetWare" was "Visine". I'll let ya'll figure out why. :) -sc > -----Original Message----- > From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, February 19, 2010 11:49 AM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: Re: What is the latest version of RDP client for Win7? > > NetBIOS Extended User Interface, but I don't know/remember the other. > I used NetBEUI with WfWg 3.0/3.1/3.11 and Netware 3.11, many moons ago. > I also used the MSFT SNA server. > > On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 19:01, Steven M. Caesare <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I'll give you a dollar if you can tell me what NetBEUI stands for without > looking it up. > > > > I'll double that if you can tell me the code name for MS's Gateway Services > for NetWare was while under development. > > > > And if you cheat and look em up u r l...@m3. > > > > -sc > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 9:58 PM > > To: NT System Admin Issues > > Subject: Re: What is the latest version of RDP client for Win7? > > > > Weren't you still on NetBEUI just last week? > > > > Heh. > > > > On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 17:52, Steven M. Caesare > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I’ll probably no longer do so either, but I’ve run Windows without > >> protocol stacks installed/bound previously, and if there’s a > >> dependency, I’d like to see it documented. > >> > >> > >> > >> Otherwise there shouldn’t be a checkbox next to the protocol that > >> makes it just as easy to disable as File and Print sharing, which you > >> can disable with relative impunity. > >> > >> > >> > >> -sc > >> > >> > >> > >> From: Free, Bob [mailto:[email protected]] > >> Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 8:41 PM > >> To: NT System Admin Issues > >> Subject: RE: What is the latest version of RDP client for Win7? > >> > >> > >> > >> I think that’s expected as it’s the party line from a Microsoft Techwriter. > >> I believe it gets the point across. With what I heard from the PFE > >> that I can’t elaborate on, what Michael alluded and a few other cases > >> I’ve heard of I’m not going to risk disabling it on my servers. It’s not > >> worth > it. > >> > >> > >> > >> From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:[email protected]] > >> Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 4:12 PM > >> To: NT System Admin Issues > >> Subject: RE: What is the latest version of RDP client for Win7? > >> > >> > >> > >> That’s unfortunately nebulous. > >> > >> > >> > >> -sc > >> > >> > >> > >> From: Free, Bob [mailto:[email protected]] > >> Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 4:24 PM > >> To: NT System Admin Issues > >> Subject: RE: What is the latest version of RDP client for Win7? > >> > >> > >> > >> The Argument against Disabling IPv6 > >> > >> It is unfortunate that some organizations disable IPv6 on their > >> computers running Windows Vista or Windows Server 2008, where it is > >> installed and enabled by default. Many disable IPv6-based on the > >> assumption that they are not running any applications or services > >> that use it. Others might disable it because of a misperception that > >> having both IPv4 and IPv6 enabled effectively doubles their DNS and Web > traffic. This is not true. > >> > >> > >> > >> From Microsoft's perspective, IPv6 is a mandatory part of the Windows > >> operating system and it is enabled and included in standard Windows > >> service and application testing during the operating system development > process. > >> Because Windows was designed specifically with IPv6 present, > >> Microsoft does not perform any testing to determine the effects of > >> disabling IPv6. If IPv6 is disabled on Windows Vista, Windows Server > >> 2008, or later versions, some components will not function. Moreover, > >> applications that you might not think are using IPv6—such as Remote > >> Assistance, HomeGroup, DirectAccess, and Windows Mail—could be. > >> > >> > >> > >> Therefore, Microsoft recommends that you leave IPv6 enabled, even if > >> you do not have an IPv6-enabled network, either native or tunneled. > >> By leaving IPv6 enabled, you do not disable IPv6-only applications > >> and services (for example, HomeGroup in Windows 7 and DirectAccess in > >> Windows 7 and Windows Server 2008 R2 are IPv6-only) and your hosts > >> can take advantage of IPv6-enhanced connectivity. > >> > >> > >> > >> http://207.46.16.252/en-us/magazine/2009.07.cableguy.aspx > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:[email protected]] > >> Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 1:05 PM > >> To: NT System Admin Issues > >> Subject: RE: What is the latest version of RDP client for Win7? > >> > >> > >> > >> I’ve had IPv6 disabled on several Win2K8 servers as well without > >> problem as far as I can tell also. > >> > >> > >> > >> -sc > >> > >> > >> > >> From: Carl Houseman [mailto:[email protected]] > >> Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 3:04 PM > >> To: NT System Admin Issues > >> Subject: RE: What is the latest version of RDP client for Win7? > >> > >> > >> > >> I've had IPV6 disabled on Vista since forever and have never had any > >> issues talking to my WSUS server. > >> > >> > >> > >> More than likely "they" had something else going on and accidentally > >> fixed it at the same time they re-enabled IPV6. > >> > >> > >> > >> Carl > >> > >> > >> > >> From: Jon Harris [mailto:[email protected]] > >> Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 3:00 PM > >> To: NT System Admin Issues > >> Subject: Re: What is the latest version of RDP client for Win7? > >> > >> > >> > >> I would add Vista and 7 as well but I have not done a lot of testing > >> on that issue. I know some of the products like WSUS were having an > >> issue with Vista clients not having IP6 turned on. I don't remember > >> what the issue was but they had problems connecting reliably to the > server. > >> > >> > >> > >> Jon > >> > >> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 2:36 PM, Free, Bob <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> Yes bad on any 2008 server > >> > >> > >> > >> From: Sam Cayze [mailto:[email protected]] > >> Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 6:15 AM > >> > >> To: NT System Admin Issues > >> Subject: RE: What is the latest version of RDP client for Win7? > >> > >> > >> > >> Can you answer this: Is it bad to do it on any 2008 machine, or just > >> a 2008 machine that will host Exchange? > >> > >> > >> > >> From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[email protected]] > >> Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 7:22 AM > >> > >> To: NT System Admin Issues > >> Subject: RE: What is the latest version of RDP client for Win7? > >> > >> > >> > >> There are known problems with doing so. And, unfortunately, before > >> you ask me what they are – I’m not allowed to say. > >> > >> > >> > >> Regards, > >> > >> > >> > >> Michael B. Smith > >> > >> Consultant and Exchange MVP > >> > >> http://TheEssentialExchange.com > >> > >> > >> > >> From: Sam Cayze [mailto:[email protected]] > >> Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 8:18 AM > >> > >> To: NT System Admin Issues > >> Subject: RE: What is the latest version of RDP client for Win7? > >> > >> > >> > >> Ok! I’ll try to find it again. > >> > >> > >> > >> Curious though, as to why it’s such a bad idea… > >> > >> > >> > >> From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[email protected]] > >> Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 6:15 AM > >> > >> To: NT System Admin Issues > >> Subject: RE: What is the latest version of RDP client for Win7? > >> > >> > >> > >> Sam – > >> > >> > >> > >> DON’T DO THAT. Dramatic enough? :-) > >> > >> > >> > >> And like Carl asked, I’m interested to know where you read it. ‘Cuz > >> I’ll try to get it fixed. > >> > >> > >> > >> Regards, > >> > >> > >> > >> Michael B. Smith > >> > >> Consultant and Exchange MVP > >> > >> http://TheEssentialExchange.com > >> > >> > >> > >> From: Carl Houseman [mailto:[email protected]] > >> Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 10:37 PM > >> > >> To: NT System Admin Issues > >> Subject: RE: What is the latest version of RDP client for Win7? > >> > >> > >> > >> Where'd you read that? > >> > >> > >> > >> From: Sam Cayze [mailto:[email protected]] > >> Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 10:33 PM > >> > >> To: NT System Admin Issues > >> Subject: RE: What is the latest version of RDP client for Win7? > >> > >> > >> > >> IP6 is disabled on the NIC(s). Something I read to do when > >> introducing > >> Ex2010 into an IPv4 environment. > >> > >> > >> > >> From: Free, Bob [mailto:[email protected]] > >> Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 4:20 PM > >> To: NT System Admin Issues > >> Subject: RE: What is the latest version of RDP client for Win7? > >> > >> > >> > >> What do you mean by ip4 only? > >> > >> > >> > >> From: Sam Cayze [mailto:[email protected]] > >> Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 8:45 AM > >> To: NT System Admin Issues > >> Subject: RE: What is the latest version of RDP client for Win7? > >> > >> > >> > >> Having a terrible time getting an RDP session open to my first Srv08 > >> server. Works 50% of the time. Have to fire up the VMware Console > >> to connect. Once I log in through the console, I can then connect to > >> the Srv08. > >> > >> > >> > >> Firewall is disabled. ip4 only. > >> > >> > >> > >> ??? > >> > >> > >> > >> ________________________________ > >> > >> From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[email protected]] > >> Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 10:41 AM > >> To: NT System Admin Issues > >> Subject: RE: What is the latest version of RDP client for Win7? > >> > >> That’s the same version I have (Win7 ultimate x64). > >> > >> > >> > >> Regards, > >> > >> > >> > >> Michael B. Smith > >> > >> Consultant and Exchange MVP > >> > >> http://TheEssentialExchange.com > >> > >> > >> > >> From: Sam Cayze [mailto:[email protected]] > >> Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 11:35 AM > >> To: NT System Admin Issues > >> Subject: What is the latest version of RDP client for Win7? > >> > >> > >> > >> I have 6.1.7600; thought 7.x was out... > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ > > <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ > > > > > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ > > <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ > <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
