Agreed. Personally, I think that's the goal every time reporters mention someone's salary in a story.
-ASB: http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 9:22 AM, David Lum <[email protected]> wrote: > The article lists their salaries…what does that have to do with anything > other than possibly pissing off people that make less? > > > > *From:* Andrew S. Baker [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Friday, March 05, 2010 6:15 AM > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:* Re: Friday OT - Web cam case > > > > So far, they are home while being paid. Good time to get a job hunt going. > > > > If they were smart, they already have documentation saying that they didn't > think it was a good idea, OR, showing that they were only operating it for > its intended use -- tracking stolen laptops. > > > > And they already have lawyers involved. So, it remains to be seen who the > losers will be. > > > > The fact that their names are already out there is a liability for them in > a job search, though, but it might not be necessary at this point. > > > -ASB: http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker > > On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 8:15 AM, Dennis Melahn <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Imagine that! The IT guys get shafted in this deal?! Why is it the IT > guys always have to take the heat? > > > http://www.philly.com/philly/news/homepage/20100305_Two_tech_workers_sidelined_in_Web-cam_case.html > > Dennis > > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
