I've found them on ebay, and then just transferred them to the Itanium chip myself.
-sc From: Phillip Partipilo [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 10:55 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: The Impending Demise of Palm HP does not have a SKU for empty binder clips. They must be purchased with an Itanic at 3x the cost Newegg would charge you. Phillip Partipilo Parametric Solutions Inc. Jupiter, Florida (561) 747-6107 From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 8:47 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: The Impending Demise of Palm Can't I use HP binder clips? From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 7:43 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: The Impending Demise of Palm Itanium's are incompatible with existing binder clips. You either need newly compiled binder clips, or have to attach your old binder clip in emulation mode. -sc From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 8:42 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: The Impending Demise of Palm I knew I kept that bad Itanium processor for a reason... Now where did I put those binder clips... From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 7:35 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: The Impending Demise of Palm Now THAT'S creative! Not a way to get chicks... but creative. -sc From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 8:29 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: The Impending Demise of Palm Alternatively (as in my staff photo), you can stick a binder clip spring to one and use a patch cable to make a geeky bolo tie! -- RMc "Steven M. Caesare" <[email protected]> wrote on 03/09/2010 07:18:47 AM: > Remember the flawed Pentiums? > > At some point you could buy one with a hole drilled thru one corner > as a trinket. You could wear it as a pendant if you were geeky enough. > > Speaking of chips... have y'all seen the Intel 8-core chips? I haven't > seen confirmed pricing, but I've heard some crazy speculation that > the could approach $20K... > > -sc > > From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 5:33 AM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: Re: The Impending Demise of Palm > > Only the chip. :) > > -ASB: http://xeesm.com/AndrewBaker > Sent from my Verizon Smartphone > > From: "Steven M. Caesare" <[email protected]> > Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 23:11:01 -0500 > To: NT System Admin Issues<[email protected]> > Subject: RE: The Impending Demise of Palm > > The chip, or a whole system? > > J > > -sc > > From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, March 08, 2010 10:04 PM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: Re: The Impending Demise of Palm > > Ah, but do you regularly use it? :) > > I have a 486 CPU sitting on my desk. > > -ASB: http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker > On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 9:53 PM, Alex Eckelberry <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]%0b> > > wrote: > I still have a Newton. > > Technology comes and goes. > > > From: Vicky Spelshaus [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, March 08, 2010 5:35 PM > > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: Re: The Impending Demise of Palm > > My very first PDA was a Palm. I remember the rep coming in and > showing us this 'great new tool'. I won mine in a sales contest and > sold many more by demonstrating its use. As they died, I replaced > with a new Palm all the way until I changed jobs and we went to > Exchange. Never could get it to sync properly and had to go to "the > dark side". Still miss graffiti.... > > > > On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 4:24 PM, Sam Cayze <[email protected]> wrote: > This truly saddens me, I've been an hardcore Palm user since the > Treo 600's and a current WebOS user. I'm not 'totally' in love with > the WEB OS, but I love the concept of it and Palm's commitment to > strive to make it better. I really want to see Palm succeed. > I've been dreading it, but I think it time to find a new platform > for my company... Goodlink is free for us, Sprint is dirt cheap, so > Palm was always an easy hardware choice for us. > > Although, I'm glad I ignored my emotional attachment to the company > and dumped their stock @ $16 ;) > > Sam > > > From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, March 08, 2010 4:16 PM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: The Impending Demise of Palm > http://www.infoworld.com/d/mobilize/palm-doomed-let-good-byes-begin-965 > > And to think they were such a huge player in bringing the PDA to the > workplace... > > -ASB: http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker > > > > > > > > -- > Organization and good planning are just crutches for people that > can't handle stress and caffeine. - unknown > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ If this email is spam, report it here: http://www.OnlyMyEmail.com/ReportSpam <http://www.onlymyemail.com/view/?action=reportSpam&Id=ODEzNjQ6MTA1NTczM jk3NDpwanBAcHNuZXQuY29tOmRlbGV0ZWQ%3D> THIS ELECTRONIC MESSAGE AND ANY ATTACHMENTS ARE CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY PROPERTY OF THE SENDER. THE INFORMATION IS INTENDED FOR USE BY THE ADDRESSEE ONLY. ANY OTHER INTERCEPTION, COPYING, ACCESSING, OR DISCLOSURE OF THIS MESSAGE IS PROHIBITED. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS MESSAGE IN ERROR, PLEASE IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE SENDER AND DELETE THIS MAIL AND ALL ATTACHMENTS. DO NOT FORWARD THIS MESSAGE WITHOUT PERMISSION OF THE SENDER. THIS ELECTRONIC MESSAGE AND ANY ATTACHMENTS ARE CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY PROPERTY OF THE SENDER. THE INFORMATION IS INTENDED FOR USE BY THE ADDRESSEE ONLY. ANY OTHER INTERCEPTION, COPYING, ACCESSING, OR DISCLOSURE OF THIS MESSAGE IS PROHIBITED. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS MESSAGE IN ERROR, PLEASE IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE SENDER AND DELETE THIS MAIL AND ALL ATTACHMENTS. DO NOT FORWARD THIS MESSAGE WITHOUT PERMISSION OF THE SENDER. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
