Touche', of course, but Im not getting that from this conversation. But sure, if something ain't compatible, it ain't compatible.
It sounds to me like all the bad vibes and ju-ju about Vista are keeping them backed off, and Windows 7 is probably "too new". With such a small deployment footprint, any issues that crop up should be easy to deal with if they arent accounted for during or pre-deployment. But, I'll say it again: I think [the OP] (or the powers that be) are making a mistake in choosing XP for new systems. This is of course based on my own experiences with it - but it /is/ a well-known easily exploited OS. I would not recommend it, and would re-petition the thinking behind not looking at Vista/7. -- ME2 On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 11:46 AM, Phil Brutsche <[email protected]>wrote: > Counterpoint: > > If Win7 won't work for him for compatibility reasons then Vista won't > either. > > On 3/31/2010 1:43 PM, Micheal Espinola Jr wrote: > > Even with the Vista faux pas' (which can clearly be mitigated with > > well-published know-how), XP is not what I would consider a "secure > > solution". I'm sure you prolly dont want to hear it, but Im just > > sayin'... I would take Vista over XP any day, if you value your client > > data security. > > > > I think you (or the powers that be) are making a mistake in choosing XP. > > -- > > Phil Brutsche > [email protected] > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ > ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
