When I was younger I used to opt for frequency over amplitude. Now I'm not much interested in either.
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Micheal Espinola Jr < [email protected]> wrote: > I also remember listening to radio via amplitude modulation! ;-) > > -- > ME2 > > > > On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Phillip Partipilo <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I remember a day/age where we did all of that MS Office stuff, with 133 >> mhz and 24 megs of RAM. Don’t think we used AV back then, however. Also >> don’t think we had the luxury of auto spell correction, uh, that silly >> ribbon thing, uh. What else… We still did all of that J >> >> >> >> >> >> Phillip Partipilo >> >> Parametric Solutions Inc. >> >> Jupiter, Florida >> >> (561) 747-6107 >> >> >> >> >> >> *From:* John Aldrich [mailto:[email protected]] >> *Sent:* Thursday, May 06, 2010 2:11 PM >> >> *To:* NT System Admin Issues >> *Subject:* RE: NOD32 Antivirus >> >> >> >> Here at my office we run Word, Excel, Outlook, IE (sometimes) and AS/400 >> terminal. These machines get bogged down on anything less than about a gig >> of memory. We’re mostly an Optiplex 740 shop here, and I started ordering my >> machines with ½ gig of memory, thinking that would be sufficient. It’s not. >> My personal experience is that even on reasonably powerful machines (AMD >> Athlon X2) you need at least a gig of memory, especially if the memory is >> shared with video. >> >> >> >> [image: John-Aldrich][image: Tile-Tools] >> >> >> >> *From:* Mike Gill [mailto:[email protected]] >> *Sent:* Thursday, May 06, 2010 1:56 PM >> >> *To:* NT System Admin Issues >> *Subject:* RE: NOD32 Antivirus >> >> >> >> 512MB is entirely adequate for XP if the primary use of the machine is MS >> Office apps. AV shouldn’t have an adverse effect on this. I would expect >> some performance hit, but not “bogged” down as the OP stated. He doesn’t >> mention CPU or CPU load, so it may not be a memory issue. >> >> >> >> Having said that, Nod32 does seem to work well in legacy environments. I >> use it on a couple of clients that have older equipment and I never hear >> complaints, nor do I notice a loss of performance when I am working on these >> machines. >> >> >> >> -- >> Mike Gill >> >> >> >> *From:* John Aldrich [mailto:[email protected]] >> *Sent:* Thursday, May 06, 2010 10:24 AM >> >> *To:* NT System Admin Issues >> *Subject:* RE: NOD32 Antivirus >> >> >> >> Dang… if Vipre bogs down the workstations, I dare say just about anything >> else you want to put on them will bog it down as well. 512 Mb is NOT a lot >> of memory. Have you looked at upgrading the memory on those machines? DDR >> and SDRAM DIMMs are not that expensive any more. >> >> >> >> [image: John-Aldrich][image: Tile-Tools] >> >> >> >> *From:* Jim Dandy [mailto:[email protected]] >> *Sent:* Thursday, May 06, 2010 1:16 PM >> *To:* NT System Admin Issues >> *Subject:* NOD32 Antivirus >> >> >> >> I’m interested in hearing feedback on NOD32 antivirus. How is it in terms >> of accuracy of identifying and protecting computers from viruses and other >> sorts of malware? How is it in terms of the load it puts on workstations? >> I’ve got a bunch of old XP systems with 512 MB ram and they seem to get >> bogged down by other antivirus software (VIPRE and Sophos). Initial tests >> indicate that NOD might be better. What is your experience? >> >> >> >> Have you used ESET NOD32? How is it as a central management point for >> antivirus on the workstations? >> >> >> >> Thanks for any help you can provide. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
<<image001.jpg>>
<<image002.jpg>>
