The girls don't seem to care...tonight As long as the mood is right. On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 3:45 PM, Richard Stovall <[email protected]> wrote:
> When I was younger I used to opt for frequency over amplitude. Now I'm not > much interested in either. > > > > On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Micheal Espinola Jr < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> I also remember listening to radio via amplitude modulation! ;-) >> >> -- >> ME2 >> >> >> >> On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Phillip Partipilo <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I remember a day/age where we did all of that MS Office stuff, with 133 >>> mhz and 24 megs of RAM. Don’t think we used AV back then, however. Also >>> don’t think we had the luxury of auto spell correction, uh, that silly >>> ribbon thing, uh. What else… We still did all of that J >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Phillip Partipilo >>> >>> Parametric Solutions Inc. >>> >>> Jupiter, Florida >>> >>> (561) 747-6107 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* John Aldrich [mailto:[email protected]] >>> *Sent:* Thursday, May 06, 2010 2:11 PM >>> >>> *To:* NT System Admin Issues >>> *Subject:* RE: NOD32 Antivirus >>> >>> >>> >>> Here at my office we run Word, Excel, Outlook, IE (sometimes) and AS/400 >>> terminal. These machines get bogged down on anything less than about a gig >>> of memory. We’re mostly an Optiplex 740 shop here, and I started ordering my >>> machines with ½ gig of memory, thinking that would be sufficient. It’s not. >>> My personal experience is that even on reasonably powerful machines (AMD >>> Athlon X2) you need at least a gig of memory, especially if the memory is >>> shared with video. >>> >>> >>> >>> [image: John-Aldrich][image: Tile-Tools] >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* Mike Gill [mailto:[email protected]] >>> *Sent:* Thursday, May 06, 2010 1:56 PM >>> >>> *To:* NT System Admin Issues >>> *Subject:* RE: NOD32 Antivirus >>> >>> >>> >>> 512MB is entirely adequate for XP if the primary use of the machine is MS >>> Office apps. AV shouldn’t have an adverse effect on this. I would expect >>> some performance hit, but not “bogged” down as the OP stated. He doesn’t >>> mention CPU or CPU load, so it may not be a memory issue. >>> >>> >>> >>> Having said that, Nod32 does seem to work well in legacy environments. I >>> use it on a couple of clients that have older equipment and I never hear >>> complaints, nor do I notice a loss of performance when I am working on these >>> machines. >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Mike Gill >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* John Aldrich [mailto:[email protected]] >>> *Sent:* Thursday, May 06, 2010 10:24 AM >>> >>> *To:* NT System Admin Issues >>> *Subject:* RE: NOD32 Antivirus >>> >>> >>> >>> Dang… if Vipre bogs down the workstations, I dare say just about anything >>> else you want to put on them will bog it down as well. 512 Mb is NOT a lot >>> of memory. Have you looked at upgrading the memory on those machines? DDR >>> and SDRAM DIMMs are not that expensive any more. >>> >>> >>> >>> [image: John-Aldrich][image: Tile-Tools] >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* Jim Dandy [mailto:[email protected]] >>> *Sent:* Thursday, May 06, 2010 1:16 PM >>> *To:* NT System Admin Issues >>> *Subject:* NOD32 Antivirus >>> >>> >>> >>> I’m interested in hearing feedback on NOD32 antivirus. How is it in >>> terms of accuracy of identifying and protecting computers from viruses and >>> other sorts of malware? How is it in terms of the load it puts on >>> workstations? I’ve got a bunch of old XP systems with 512 MB ram and they >>> seem to get bogged down by other antivirus software (VIPRE and Sophos). >>> Initial tests indicate that NOD might be better. What is your experience? >>> >>> >>> >>> Have you used ESET NOD32? How is it as a central management point for >>> antivirus on the workstations? >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks for any help you can provide. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
<<image001.jpg>>
<<image002.jpg>>
