I'll take either, as long as I get good reception!

 

From: Richard Stovall [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 2:45 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: NOD32 Antivirus

 

When I was younger I used to opt for frequency over amplitude.  Now I'm not 
much interested in either.

 

 

On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Micheal Espinola Jr <[email protected]> 
wrote:

I also remember listening to radio via amplitude modulation! ;-)

--
ME2





On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Phillip Partipilo <[email protected]> wrote:

I remember a day/age where we did all of that MS Office stuff, with 133 mhz and 
24 megs of RAM.  Don't think we used AV back then, however.  Also don't think 
we had the luxury of auto spell correction, uh,  that silly ribbon thing, uh.  
What else... We still did all of that J

 

 

Phillip Partipilo

Parametric Solutions Inc.

Jupiter, Florida

(561) 747-6107

 

 

From: John Aldrich [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 2:11 PM


To: NT System Admin Issues

Subject: RE: NOD32 Antivirus

 

Here at my office we run Word, Excel, Outlook, IE (sometimes) and AS/400 
terminal. These machines get bogged down on anything less than about a gig of 
memory. We're mostly an Optiplex 740 shop here, and I started ordering my 
machines with ½ gig of memory, thinking that would be sufficient. It's not. My 
personal experience is that even on reasonably powerful machines (AMD Athlon 
X2) you need at least a gig of memory, especially if the memory is shared with 
video.

 

  

 

From: Mike Gill [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 1:56 PM


To: NT System Admin Issues

Subject: RE: NOD32 Antivirus

 

512MB is entirely adequate for XP if the primary use of the machine is MS 
Office apps. AV shouldn't have an adverse effect on this. I would expect some 
performance hit, but not "bogged" down as the OP stated. He doesn't mention CPU 
or CPU load, so it may not be a memory issue.

 

Having said that, Nod32 does seem to work well in legacy environments. I use it 
on a couple of clients that have older equipment and I never hear complaints, 
nor do I notice a loss of performance when I am working on these machines.

 

-- 
Mike Gill

 

From: John Aldrich [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 10:24 AM


To: NT System Admin Issues

Subject: RE: NOD32 Antivirus

 

Dang... if Vipre bogs down the workstations, I dare say just about anything 
else you want to put on them will bog it down as well. 512 Mb is NOT a lot of 
memory. Have you looked at upgrading the memory on those machines? DDR and 
SDRAM DIMMs are not that expensive any more.

 



 

From: Jim Dandy [mailto:[email protected]] 

Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 1:16 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: NOD32 Antivirus

 

I'm interested in hearing feedback on NOD32 antivirus.  How is it in terms of 
accuracy of identifying and protecting computers from viruses and other sorts 
of malware?  How is it in terms of the load it puts on workstations?  I've got 
a bunch of old XP systems with 512 MB ram and they seem to get bogged down by 
other antivirus software (VIPRE and Sophos).  Initial tests indicate that NOD 
might be better.  What is your experience?

 

Have you used ESET NOD32?  How is it as a central management point for 
antivirus on the workstations?

 

Thanks for any help you can provide.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

<<image001.jpg>>

<<image002.jpg>>

Reply via email to